Research On Local Legislative Project Evaluation System

Legislation project evaluation refers to the evaluation and analysis of a certain legislative project by a specific evaluation subject according to certain procedures and standards,and finally determines whether the legislative project will continue to be translated into legal activities.The legislative project evaluation mainly solves the problem of whether problems in social life need to be regulated by legislation.If it is necessary to carry out regulation in the form of legislation,then when and how to proceed.It assesses the elements of legislation before the legislative process and excludes legislative items that are not suitable for legislation or that are not yet satisfactory.The improvement of the quality of legislation looks at the pre-legislative stage,so as to prevent the legislative deviation in advance.Through the evaluation results,the local legislature promptly corrects improper local legislative acts and avoids illegal and unreasonable local laws and regulations entering social life.With a view to reducing the trial and error costs of local legislation.?The Outline of the Implementation of the Construction of the Rule of Law?(2015-2020)is clearly proposed: "Improve the system of public collection of legislative projects to the public,and improve the legislative project argumentation system by means of pre-legislative assessment." The evaluation of legislative items,the demonstration of legislative items before legislation,the evaluation of legislative items as an important procedure to reduce the cost of trial and error and improve the quality of legislation has been upgraded to the requirements of the national level.Despite the exploration of the legislative project evaluation system in various places,due to the subjective and objective reasons,the legislative project evaluation work lacks uniform standards.Except for a few provinces,most of them are proposed in a trial and suggestion tone.The legislature has a higher degree of freedom in adopting the legislative project to evaluate this mode of operation.In addition,the subject,content,procedure,effectiveness,and principle content of the legislative project evaluation are not only different in the country,but also there is very little comprehensive evaluation of the local legislative project.Therefore,the effect expected by each place is difficult to achieve.It raises doubts about the significance of legislative project evaluation.The main body of this paper is divided into five chapters,which explore the basis of the local legislative project evaluation system,the main body and evaluation system,methods and the end of the implementation and evaluation activities.The first chapter analyzes the local legislative project evaluation system from the theoretical perspective of the constitution and law and economics,and also makes a corresponding analysis based on the current domestic reality.The second chapter first discusses the main body configuration of the evaluation system.The evaluation subject persists throughout the whole process of evaluation of legislative items.How to choose the evaluation subject and make reasonable allocation is a problem that needs to be focused on.According to the three characteristics of neutrality,objectivity and professionalism,the author makes a balanced consideration of the allocation of the subject.Then in the evaluation criteria section,the author analyzed the main content of the evaluation criteria and the factors that need to be considered.A comprehensive set of evaluation criteria system has been comprehensively set up,which has been explored from both qualitative and quantitative analysis.The evaluation method and the evaluation procedure are two parts.The evaluation method has its own unique instrumental value,and the appropriate and appropriate evaluation method can be used to comprehensively and systematically evaluate all aspects of the legislative project,and obtain a report with reasonable conclusion and high credibility.The evaluation process requires a reasonable integration of the evaluation methods.Inthe design of the program,the author design is evaluated by the basic and deep procedures in conjunction with the evaluation method.The fifth chapter analyzes the relevant content of the end of the evaluation activities.After the end of the legislative project evaluation process,what remains is the final link: the results of the assessment are produced.The expression of the results of the legislative project evaluation is the evaluation report.The data and judgments obtained from the two procedures of the basic evaluation procedure and the in-depth evaluation procedure form an assessment report including the status quo,problems,objectives and plans.As for the results of the assessment report,the author believes that it should play a greater role,the evaluation results have been in a state of reference only,the role and significance of legislative project evaluation is greatly reduced.Therefore,we must give the assessment report a certain mandatory value,so that it can play the substantive value of the legislative project evaluation report.This paper analyzes the relevant theories and practices of the evaluation activities of local legislative projects in China.Learn from the experience of assessing and regulating impact analysis before foreign legislation.Trying to form a comprehensive and comprehensive institutional system.At the same time,we can try to show some more elaborate and unique ideas and designs in the micro.