The Judge Personnel System Research Based On The Public Goods Theory

The law,started with the goods,is always considered as a private good of the rich.As the sayings go by the common people that "The law is the game of the rich men" and that "Goirgto law with money,but go to the jail with no money ",they think the rich could escape punishment by law with money employing good lawyers even of the rich break the law.The common people also hold an opinion that the poor only can accept the punishment by law because they couldn't afford to pay for the lawyers.Therefore,the original cognition of the law by the people is that the law is only a tool of punishing and defrauding the poor,but not an article that the ordinary people can afford to pay for.The phenomenon above is not the one that the rulling party would like to see because the law,the public goods,upholds the verity to anyone and should be like the goods that can be aftorded to use.Instead,it shouldn't be someone's private article.The authority and nationd nature of law would be an empty shell if law is only valid to someone,which isn't beneficial for the rulling party to set up and carry out the related regulations.It is because it exists some let-alone situation or some situation that someone turns a blind eyes to on the superstructure that leading to the law which should have belonged to the public goods service,becomes someone's private goods.Not only does it distort the nature and aims of law,but it also does harm to the social development and nation's peace.The reason why it doesn't make further progress on Chinese Judicial System is that the Chinese Judicial System couldn't bring better service to law which doesn't play a good role of showing all function of public goods.Law couldn't be applied to on people's life and its effect to society can't bring a period called "someone hears about",but does not really step into a period called "someone has used".Therefore,the Judiciary Innovation must be enforced.Applying law to serving people is the first aim of the Judiciary Innovation,and court plays more important role than ever before of it.Besides,judge the executor of court function making full use of law and developing its nature,then serve people batter service by applying to law.I am engaged in law,staying in a period of Judiciary Innovation,even experienced the actual situation of Judiciary Innovation in person.As a jndicial official,I am competent for studying Judiciary Innovation,especially the Judge Personnel System.Keeping closed contact with the author and making research by combining the pure public goods theory with the practice,I an view the nature of Judiciary Innovation form a new perspective,which is good for further knowing and carrying out the actionsand policy of Judiciary Innovation.The lawyers' reform is the first mission of Judiciary Innovation,and the proposal of the Judge Personnel System is the inevitable outcome of it.How to make a better working regulation of the Judge Personnel System is the precondition for whether we can successfully complete the Judiciary Innovation.Judiciary Innovation starts form June,2014,and it is completed basically in January in2017 throngh three rounds test run reform.The direct aim of Judiciary Innovation is to push the development of the Judge Team professionalisim and elitism.The expectation behind the aim is that the professirnal and the best judges groups will well done the cases,and make it fair and impartial during The trial.As a result,we can call the Judge Personnel System a kind of reform of Trial Quality Orientation.The Judge Personnel System is also considered the most important and most difficult action of this Judiciary Innovation,form which whether it can be reformed snuessfully or not with directly influence the promotion of other Judiciary Innovation measures.This essay provides more beneficial theoretic support for Judiciary Innovation by combining the public Goods Theory and researching the Judge Rersonnel system on how to work.