Research On Goal Orientation In School Sports And Competitive Sports

Target orientation has always been a hot issue in the psychology community.Goal orientation plays a crucial role in the performance of athletes and the development of students.Through reading a large amount of literature data,it is found that most scholars believe that task orientation is a positive goal orientation,and self-orientation is a negative goal orientation.In the school sports for students,researchers agree that task orientation should be advocated.In competitive sports,the scholars' research results are very different.Most scholars believe that task orientation should be advocated in competitive sports,but there are also a few researchers who hold different opinions.Advocates for athletes should point out that task-oriented scholars point out that athletes with high task orientation have low levels of anxiety and high internal motivation,which is more conducive to the improvement of athletes' performance.And advocating that athletes should be self-directed researchers,pointing out that self-orientation helps athletes achieve excellent results.In the face of disagreements in the research,this study attempted to investigate the target orientation,trait anxiety,sports motivation,and other information of 542 students in the school and 337 athletes in the sports center,to understand the current situation of the school students and athletes in these areas and the goal.The relationship between orientation,level of anxiety,and motivation for movement was explored in an attempt to find out the laws.Provide guidance for school students and competitive athletes to choose the correct target orientation.result:1.In goal orientation: Students of different ages have significant differences in task orientation(p=0.000<0.05)and self orientation(p=0.000<0.05);students of different gender also have differences(task orientation(p= 0.001<0.05),self-orientation(p=0.019<0.05));athletes of different age groups had significant differences in self-orientation(p=0.020<0.05);results of studies of different-sex athletes and different-sex students were always in task orientation.(p=0.009<0.05),there was a significant difference in self-orientation(p=0.013<0.05);athletes of different grades had significant differences in self-orientation(P=0.043<0.05)but in task orientation(P=0.958).>0.05)There is no significant difference.Athletes and students have significant differences in task orientation(p=0.002<0.05).2.In the level of anxiety: There were significant differences in trait anxiety between students of different genders(p=0.006<0.05)and athletes(p=0.025<0.05);there were also significant differences between athletes and students in trait anxiety levels(p= 0.000<0.05).3.In the motivation of sports: Students of different age groups had significant differences in internal motivation(P=0.000<0.05)and external motivation(P=0.001<0.05).Different gender students also had significant differences in internal motivation(p=0.000<0.05)and external motivation(p=0.000<0.05).Athletes of different age groups had significant differences in external motivation(P=0.009<0.05).Different gender athletes(internal motivation(p=0.000<0.05),external motivation(p=0.000<0.05))and students of different genders(internal motivation(p=0.000<0.05),external motivation(p=0.000<0.05))The differences in sports motivation are consistent.Different levels of athletes had significant differences in external motivation(p=0.000<0.05)and no motivation(p=0.000<0.05).4.There is a positive correlation between the athlete's exercise level and self-orientation,but there is no correlation with the task orientation.There is a negative correlation between trait anxiety level and task orientation,but there is no correlation with self orientation.5.The regression analysis of the exercise level as the dependent variable shows that there is a statistically significant difference between the athlete's exercise level and self-orientation(p=0.010<0.05).6.Self-directed(p=0.000<0.05),anxiety(p=0.000<0.05),intrinsic motivation(p=0.000<0.05),external motivation(p=0.000<0.05),none There was a significant difference in motivation(p=0.022<0.05).The high task orientation group had high internal motivation scores and low anxiety scores.7.Low self-directed group and high self-directed group at the exercise level(p=0.020<0.05),task orientation(p=0.000<0.05),intrinsic motivation(p=0.000<0.05),external motivation(p=0.000<0.05))There are significant differences in terms.in conclusion:1.Target orientation,anxiety level,and different sports motives of different age groups,different genders,and different sports participation groups(athletes,students)with different exercise levels.2.There is a positive correlation between the athlete's exercise level and self-orientation,and there is no relationship with the task orientation.3.There is no correlation between self-directed and anxiety levels.4.There is a statistically significant difference between the athlete's exercise level and self-orientation.5.High task orientation group The lower task orientation group has higher internal motivation and lower anxiety level.6.The task goal orientation is more suitable for school students.Self-targeting is more suitable for competitive athletes.