Font Size: a A A

Technical And Tactical Analysis Of Chinese Men's Ping-pong Player Lin Gaoyuan

Posted on:2020-07-22Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:T T WuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2417330575468445Subject:Sports
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Object:summarizing the technique&tactic features of Lin Gaoyuan,analyzing advantages and disadvantages so as to provide references and suggestions for his future training and competitions.Methods:employing literature review,video observation,three phase evaluation,double three phase evaluation,statistics and so on,took 30world level matches of Lin Gaoyuan during 2017-2018 as research object,analyzing Lin's performance against players from the domestic associations and foreign associations with overall three phase evaluation,single strike technique,connective technique,change of technique&tactics and stability.The results shown:from overall three phase evaluation,the scoring rates in descending sequence were attack after service,attack after receiving,and stalemate phase;using rate of sidespin service over60%,backhand technique using rate at the 3rd strike reached 52.11%,scoring rate of short chop and inside-out forehand went beyond 60%,scoring rate of sidespin service with the 3rd connective strike reached 53.07%,scoring rate of reverse sidespin service with the 3rd connective strike reached 51.56%,scoring rate of spin&non-spin combination service with the 3rd connective strike reached 71.10%;when played against players from different associations,the scoring rates of both receiving by quick flick and short drop were lower than 50%,scoring rate of techniques of the 4th strike only reached 41.44%,the scoring rates of the 4th connection by receiving with drop,flick,backhand loop inside table were all around 40%,on the other hand,the scoring rates of the 4th connection by receiving with push only reached 22.5%,the scoring rate of stalemate phase reached 44.02%;for different stages of one game,all using rates of three phases during the opening stage,middle game stage and closing stage all followed the order“attack after receiving”>“stalemate phase”>“attack after service phase”,scoring rates declined significantly from“attack after service phase”to“attack after receiving phase”to“stalemate phase”;using rates of three phases were relative equal,what's more,the scoring rates of“attack after service phase”during open stage,middle game stage and closing stage were all beyond 60%,the scoring rates of“attack after receiving phase”from open stage,middle game stage to closing stage declined,the scoring rates of“stalemate phase”from open stage,middle game stage to closing stage fluctuated obviously.The main conclusions were:Lin Gaoyuan had obvious advantage in attack after service phase,minor advantage in attack after receiving phase,losing most points in stalemate phase;Lin mainly used sidespin service which created overall positive effect,the main 3rd strike technique was backhand,however,it was drop and inside-out forehand with good effect.Lin also had advantage in the connection of 1stt and 3rd strike;Lin's receiving didn't create him optimum effect,losing a large amount of points by flick and drop when played against players from different associations;the4th strike was Lin's obvious short-come,the connection between 2nd and 4th strike had big problem,receiving by push connect with the 4th strike had the lowest scoring rate;when enter into stalemate phase,Lin usually forced into inferior position,though the situation was relative well when played against players from foreign associations;there were no significant changes of technique&tactic features in all three phases;Lin's attack after service phase performed well with good stability,and that of the attack after receiving phase and stalemate phase were the other way round.
Keywords/Search Tags:table tennis, Lin Gaoyuan, technique & tactic, analysis
PDF Full Text Request
Related items