| In order to stimulate students 'interest in football,improve students' football sports skills,assess students 'football skills and changes in development,and measure the development of football on campus.On June 27,2016,the Ministry of Education officially issued the basic guidance document and basic standards for the education of campus football education.The ? Standards for the Evaluation of Student Football Sports Skills(Trial)?(hereinafter referred to as ?Standards?).In the course of more than a year of ?standards? promotion,It has not been seen from the literature that scholars have studied the rationality and effectiveness of the various skill test methods of the ?secondary standard? in the ?standard?and the scientific and feasible nature of the ? secondary standard ?.This study obtained data from 400 primary school men's football players with two level 2 skills test items.There were200 school-based students and 200 training students.The data were processed and compared using statistical methods such as variance analysis.The main conclusions show that:1.By comparing the test results of different types of students,we can find that there are significant differences between school-based and training classes in the students 'head-on bounding,dribbling and folding running and comprehensive scoring.It shows that the three test items such as the forefoot kick,the ball dribble and the folding run are reasonable and effective.There is no significant difference in kicking accuracy,indicating that there are still problems in the test method of kicking accuracy and it needs to be improved.After frequency analysis of the kick score,it was found that the scores of the kick scores in both the school-based class and the training class were mainly concentrated between 4-6 points,and the number of high-segmented people was higher than the number of low-segmented people,indicating that the difficulty of the project was low.There is no significant difference between different types of students,so the difficulty of kicking should be increased appropriately.2.Through the comparative study of students with different cumulative number of classes in school-based classes,it was found that there was no significant difference between students with different cumulative number of classes.The rationality and validity of the test method of the head-on bounding and the volley running are further verified.3.Through the comparative study of students with different cumulative training times in training courses,it was found that there are very significant differences in the athletes 'head-on backswing,round ball dribble,kick accuracy and comprehensive score in different training times,indicating that training can improve the athletes' head-on backswing.,around the ball dribble,kick ability,Can also improve the comprehensive quality of athletes;There is no significant difference in the folding run.Through the analysis of the frequency of the folding run,it is found that the students' performance in the folding run of different cumulative training times is mainly concentrated in the range of 7-10 points,indicating that for the training class students,the folding run project The difficulty may be low?4.The results of the card square test of the compliance situation in this study can show that the ?secondary standard?is reasonable and effective.Through the study,it was found that even if the student has been trained for a long time,the compliance rate can only reach 54.1 %,indicating that the standard score(7.5 points)For students at this stage,The score may be too high?... |
PDF Full Text Request