Employment Issue Of Aboriginals Induced By Large-scale Park Development Project

Large-scale parks generally refer to industrial parks that are based on the urban planning of the city where the project is located,are dominated by a dominant industry,and appropriately centralized to promote industrial upgrading and urbanization.The large-scale park development projects in China have induced many land acquisition and demolition projects,forcing a large number of aboriginal people to relocate.However,Aboriginal people still face many challenges in the new environment.Among them,the employment problem is one of the challenges they face.No employment,no living,and no social security are the three main difficulties that they face in the new environment.What exactly is the situation of the aboriginal people’s employment and what are the influencing factors are the questions that we need to think about.However,domestic and foreign scholars still have the following deficiencies in the study of the employment of Aboriginal people affected by the project: 1)Too much emphasis is placed on the study of landless peasants,while ignoring other non-leaver peasants who are also affected by the project.2)The reference literature has a large limitation,which easily affects the quality of the research results.3)When Chinese scholars study the problem of landless peasants in the process of urbanization,the research cases may not be representative due to the lack of classification discussions under different circumstances.4)Too much emphasis on quantitative research and lack of in-depth qualitative research.Combining the above research insufficiencies,this article adopted constructive grounded theory proposed by scholars led by Charmarz,using Nanjing Jiangning Economic and Technological Development Zone as an example,forming a theoretical framework to describe the employment of aboriginal people,explaining and analyzing the impacts of large-scale parks’ intervention of the community aboringins living in.The status of employment,influencing factors,and the interrelationships among these factors were particularly discussed.The main conclusions of this paper’s theory of employment generation are as follows: 1)Aboriginal people are mainly engaged in the labor service work at the bottom of urban economy,and the types of work are limited.Some Aboriginal people will choose to work with more commuting time and working hours in order to obtain higher salaries.However,due to the disadvantaged position in the employment relationship and resource information,the aboriginal people are vulnerable to exploitation by the employer and the general salary is still low.3)In the internal driving core category,the family and demographic characteristics are the most important ones for the problem of aboriginal employment.The family’s spending needs will affect the physical and psychological pressure of the aboriginal people,thus affecting their life and employment experience.When family members are able to work in cities with higher wages,the aboriginal people’s own burden is lighter and they tend to engage in relatively low pay and easy work.Aboriginal people’s self-consciousness and form have been affected in many ways and will eventually affect the aboriginal people’s positive or negative attitude towards their work and life,thus affecting different work and life experiences.Among the characteristics of the population structure,the aboriginals with higher academic qualifications,young and healthy are more likely to adapt to the work and life of the city.4)In the external driving core category,in addition to resettlement subsidies policies that affect the work and life experience of aboriginal people,some external factors,such as urban social security,delayed retirement employment policies,and urban market economic system characteristics,will affect the employment of aboriginal peoples.5)The impact of driving the core areas on the employment of aboriginal peoples is understood by the author as a high-or secondary-level impact on the society.In addition,this article also found some conclusions that are different with previous research perspectives or our subjective common sense,such as: 1)Strengthening skills training for women does not necessarily increase the employment rate of Aboriginal people in cities.2)Aboriginal peoples will still have different attitudes towards relevant policies under the same resettlement subsidies and employment support policies.3)When public officials handle improperly aboriginal people’s inconsistencies,for example,injecting pepper water to an aborigine who submits opinions or demands,and directly providing employment benefits or subsistence allowances to troubled people without assessment,it is easy to provoke aborigines and the government.More contradictions in projects and projects have entered a vicious circle.4)The park development project has less employment impact on higher education and active entrepreneurs;it is easier to obtain benefits from park development projects during the school age,entrepreneurship,and non-agricultural careers.However,due to the constraints of resources and time,the data collected during the interview may not be complete.It is difficult to comprehensively study the third batches of relocation and resettlement of aboriginal people.The classification and definition of various categories,genres and attributes in the research process are not It must be absolutely accurate.Therefore,the follow-up study can focus on the analysis of aboriginal people in the third batch of relocation and resettlement;observe their consumptive consumption behavior;and evaluate the cumulative social effects due to various factors.