| Huang Shi,the specialist of Qing Dynasty.He not only reads a lot of books,but also has a wealth of knowledge,and collects fruitful results,and Ma Guohan(mainly edited as"Yuhanshanfang Collection"),Yan Kejun(mainly compiled as "All three generations of Qin and Han Dynasties and Six Dynasties")and so on.The main compilation of Huang’s work is "Huang Shi Yi Shu Kao".For a long time,compared with the gratifying achievements of Ma’s and Yan’s research,the academic circles have little research on Huang’s and his collections.Only the relevant articles of Mr.Cao Shujie have carried out a macroscopic observation of his collection activities,including his life and writings.The book version,etc.,did not conduct an in-depth examination of its compilation process,compilation and features.This article takes the "Huang Shi Yi Shu Kao" as the object,and goes deep into the achievements and characteristics of Huang’s collection.Because of the huge volume of the book,the author selected the Eastern Han Cai Yong’s "Yue Ling Annotations","Yue Ling Q&A" and "Mingtang Yue Ling Theory" for specific analysis and research,the reference materials of the three books,the treatment of the text,and even the collation.Research on corrections and other issues.On this basis,explore its achievements and limitations,and have a deeper understanding of Huang’s collection and "Huang Shi Yi Shu Kao".Cai’s "Yue Ling Annotations" is a serious spread,no rumors,"Yue Ling Q&A" and "Mingtang Yue Ling theory" have been passed down to this day,but the versions are different.According to the author’s statistics,the main sources of the three books of Cai’s "Yue Ling"compiled by Huang are the scriptures and ancient notes of the Han Dynasty,as well as the books and related historical books of the Tang and Song Dynasties,as well as the ancient notes of the Wei,Jin and Southern and Northern Dynasties.Among them,the time limit of the cited materials is the Ming Dynasty(Sun Jue’s "The Ancient Book"),indicating that the three books were roughly succumbed to the end of the Ming Dynasty.The three methods of the "Yue Ling" series edited by Huang have many distinctive features.First of all,he pointed out the source of the original text of the "Yue Ling",and some of the essays in the "Yue Ling Annotations" have version differences.Huang’s collections are one by one,showing the richness and diversity of the collection of literature materials.Secondly,in the process of collecting and compiling,Huang has closely combined the proverbs with the collation,and attached the collation to the prose,and he used the case system in many places to arrange the case and the proverbs and the citations in an orderly manner.After the book is quoted,the case is attached.Finally,Huang’s use of the segmentation symbol "○" makes the visual effect and separation effect of the essay layout better.The three books of the "Yue Ling" compiled by Huang are compared with the Ma’s and Yan s series in terms of the complete content of the compilation,the collation of the essays,and the layout of the essays,which can better reflect Huang’s collection and "Huang Shi Yi Shu Kao".The characteristics of the book test.The so-called compilation content is full,mainly including the number of essays and the number of sources.In terms of the number of essays,Huang is more than Ma and Yan.In terms of the materials cited in the essay,all three have indicated the source.According to the comparison between "Yue Ling Annotations" and "Yue Ling Q&A",it is known that Huang has indicated the source of the original "Yue Ling" and Ma does not.The same essay often has different sources of literature(such as "the dew,the liquid of the Yin;the release of the dew,the frost",the essays appear in "Guang Yun","Beitang Booknotes","Events Annotations")In the literature,Huang has the same number of citations than Ma,but not as strict as Yan.Therefore,in the description of the source of the essay,Huang is detailed in Ma s,and Yan is detailed in Huang.In the aspect of Yuwen collation,Yan has less effort and almost no collation;Huang prefers to use a variety of collation methods and use a variety of collation methods,especially the school method for collation;while Ma tends to rely on a small number of documents.Information,list different versions to present differences,and do not collate the lost Writings.In terms of lost Writings’ collation,Huang is skilled in Ma and Yan.In addition,Ma wrote a small order for most of the 630 books(the other is 632);and Yan s 3497 authors have a small biography.In contrast,Huang did not write a small order,nor did it authorize the author.The reasons for the above various differences are mainly caused by the differences in their motivations."Huang Shi Yi Shu Kao" pays more attention to the revelation of the collection process,pays attention to the collation of the prose,and has a very obvious "test"feature.Ma and Yan’s pay more attention to the results of the compilation,which is to provide readers with the "original book" or "original text" that is closest to the original.In general,the similarities and differences between the results of the three of them can be found in the different settings of the collection goals.Starting with the three books of the "Yue Ling" edited by Huang,we can basically reveal the main achievements and shortcomings of the "Huang Shi Yi Shu Kao".In general,the number of essays in the "Huang Shi Yi Shu kao" is relatively rich and the literature materials are rich.Moreover,he noticed that the collection was associated with the version.In the process of collecting,he could use a variety of collation methods to provide more sophisticated texts for later generations.However,there are also some shortcomings such as the lack of detailed descriptions of the citations and the lack of detailed descriptions of the citations. |
