A Study On The Acquisition Of Chinese Imperative Sentences By Students Of Daegu Tourism High School In South Korea

Imperative sentences are used to express suggestions,orders,dissuasions,requests,prohibitions and other purposes in modern Chinese.Compared with declarative sentences,interrogative sentences and exclamatory sentences,imperative sentences have significant communicative characteristics.There are various ways of expressing imperative meaning in Chinese.Previous studies on the ontology of imperative sentences in Chinese have been thoroughly explored and fruitful results have been achieved.However,there are few studies on foreign students' acquisition of Chinese imperative sentences,especially Korean students'acquisition of Chinese imperative sentences.This paper takes the first and second grade students of Daegu Tourism High School in Korea as the object of investigation.Firstly,it elaborates the reasons for choosing the topic from the perspective of second language acquisition.Secondly,it combs the research results of predecessors in the concepts and definitions of imperative sentences in Chinese,syntactic structure,semantics and pragmatic functions,combines the bias error of imperative sentences in Chinese,comparative studies between Chinese and Korean,and teaching research,using methods of questionnaire survey,quantitative statistics and qualitative analysis,individual interviews to pave the way for the analysis of the following chapters.The first chapter investigates the content of imperative sentences in the domestic syllabus and Korean syllabus,finding that imperative sentences are not listed as separate grammatical items in the two syllabuses.Secondly,by comparing the imperative sentences in Korean native textbooks "Chinese In and "Chinese Language of Sightseeing ",find that there are imbalances in the requirements of affirmative imperative sentences and negative imperative sentences in both textbooks.As far as the content of imperative sentences is concerned,"Chinese I" focuses on imperative sentences in basic daily conversations,while "Chinese Language of Sightseeing " has a wide range of content sources.In the second chapter,through the form of questionnaire survey,we find out the students'choice tendency of implementing imperative strategies,the influence of learning Chinese time on acquiring imperative sentences,the proportion of correct use of Chinese imperative sentences and the differences in the use of reminders,key actors and additional actors,as well as the types and characteristics of bias error in the implementation of imperative strategies.The analysis shows that in choosing imperative strategies,students show different inclination characteristics on the whole and horizontal aspects.The time of learning Chinese has a certain impact on the acquisition of imperative sentences,but with the increasing difficulty of learning,the impact gradually weakens.The main types of bias error are erroneous order,omission,addition and substitution,which have shown a high error rate of errors and omissions.Chapter three puts forward relevant teaching suggestions from four perspectives of teachers,textbooks,class and learning strategies according to the causes of bias error and teachers'feedback,such as improving the understanding of Chinese imperative sentences,strengthening the comparison between mother tongue and target language;arranging the content of Chinese imperative sentences pertinently,setting up imperative sentences exercises combined with cultural activities;adopting inductive summary method,adhering to the principle of concise speaking and more practice in teaching;understanding students' learning strategies,and guiding them to form correct thinking mode of imperative sentences,etc.Finally,the main conclusions of this paper are summarized from the perspective of students'correct acquisition of Chinese imperative sentences and formation of bias error,hoping to help Korean students acquire Chinese imperative sentences,and hope that future research will make more supplements to the shortcomings of this paper.