Livelihood Captial Mobility Of Original Resident Households Under Village Land Redevelopment

In the period of new urbanization,urban land use gradually turns from incremental utilization of non-agricultural land to stock utilization with potential The reconstruction and land redevelopment of villages in cities is an inevitable phenomenon in the process of urbanization.Livelihood is the foundation of people's livelihood.The sustainable livelihood of the original residents in urban villages is related to the real interests of the original residents and the sustainable and stable development of the society.This study investigated the livelihood data of 317 original resident households and 109 surrounding non-transformed urban village households in Xiyuan and Qingniancheng of Wuhan.Using the sustainable livelihood theory and mobility method,this paper analyzes the livelihood capital mobility and its internal causes of the original resident households in the urban village reconstruction land redevelopment,and draws conclusions:(1)The reconstruction of villages in cities can improve the livelihood capital of the original residents to a certain extent,and the original residents can share the land appreciation dividend brought by the rapid development of cities.The livelihood capital of the original residents in Xiyuan community,which took the form of social fund raising,and the Qingniancheng community,which took the form of joint construction by government and developers,increased by 13.66%and 4.83%respectively.The living capital of the original residents in Xiyuan community and Qingniancheng community is 7.3 percent and 12.8 percent higher than that of the non-residents.In addition,the capital changes of the original residents in the two urban villages show obvious consistency.Among them,material,financial,social and psychological capital significantly increased,while natural capital decreased to zero.(2)The relative and absolute mobility of livelihood capital of the original residents in Xiyuan community under the mode of social fund-raising reconstruction is greater than that of the Qingniancheng community under the mode of joint construction by the government and developers.The establishment of area compensation baseline has significant differentiation effect on the livelihood capital mobility of residents in higher groups.After the reform,the level of livelihood capital of the original resident households in higher groups decreased.From the perspective of welfare,the two models improve the social welfare of the middle class(lower middle class,middle middle class and upper middle class).Only under the model of joint construction by the government and developers,the Qingniancheng has taken into account the welfare of the residents of the low livelihood capital group.The mobility of livelihood capital in the two redeveloped communities is different.The low livelihood capital group was relatively lack of mobility,mainly maintaining the in-situ order,while the other groups were relatively liquid,but the mobility directions of different groups were different.(3)There is a strong correlation between the livelihood capital of urban village residents before and after the household reconstruction,but there are differences in the importance and direction of the influence of various types of capital The intrinsic causes of the mobility of livelihood capital are different in different modes of transformation and different classes of livelihood capital The upward mobility of livelihood capital in Xiyuan community mainly depends on the accumulation of human capital and financial capital Qingniancheng is mainly human,social,financial and material capital accumulation.The lower the psychological capital of residents before the reform,the easier the upward mobility of their livelihood capital after the reform.In addition,the mobility of livelihood capital of residents in Xiyuan community is greatly affected by the natural capital before the reconstruction.And the influence that Qingniancheng village suffers natural capital is lesser.According to the research conclusions,it is suggested that relevant scholars and policy makers should change the traditional concept of government and improve the relevant compensation and placement mechanism.We will establish and improve the social security system for rural residents in urban areas,and adapt it to local conditions.To increase the investment in the livelihood capital of residents and improve their ability to accumulate the livelihood capital;At the same time,it solves the psychological construction problem of the original residents for the reconstruction of the villages in the city and avoids falling into the trap of the downward mobility of livelihood capital Tries to set up the compensation area baseline to to create a free mobility of capital elements mobility channel,through the residents of the higher livelihood capital class to break the solidification of the class...