| With the acceleration of advance of the new type of urbanization process in China,in order to realize realization the integration of urban and rural planning as a whole development earlier,we must solve many problems in the process of land expropriation.On one hand,the landless farmers can’t get the value-added benefits of farmland expropriation;On the other hand,it was a lot of money that the government obtained the land value-added incomes,which formed a lot of land revenue,but the revenue did not feedback the countryside to support rural construction.In the urban expansion process,the low-yielding agricultural collective land was transformed into the high-yielding urban construction land.During the process it has produced great value-added,and the growth is irreversible in a short time.In order to promote the integration of urban and rural development,the 18th report of the Communist Party of China put forward that "it’s essential to reform land requisition system and improve the farmers’ proportion of the land value-added income." It means that the current land expropriation system did not consider the farmers’ proportion of the land value-added income.Firstly,based on the literature review and basic theory of learning,the paper finds out the research questions and defines the object of study.Secondly the paper introduces the comprehensive value of farmland and selects the methods of calculation.Using incoming approach investment method,shadow price method,results reference method,decomposition method and difference method etc.to quantify the economic,social and ecological value of farmland and the value of farmland development right.Thirdly,clearing the concept and composition of land value-added income in the process of land expropriation,and studying the formation process based on the comprehensive value of farmland,in order to determine the calculation method of land value-added income and the theoretical distribution framework.Finally,taking Nanjing as an example for the empirical analysis.Through the research,the following conclusions are obtained:(1)Except the economic value,the comprehensive value of farmland also contains social and ecological value and the value of farmland development right.Through the calculation,according to the value from small to large arranged,the value of social stability<the economic value<the ecological value<the value of social security<the value of farmland development right.The value of farmland development right is at the top,accounting for up to 90.98%.The social and ecological values are non-market values,accounting for 8.37%.By contrast,the economic value is only 0.64%,so,the value of farmland was largely underestimated.(2)Through the study of land value-added income formation mechanism and scale measurement,it is found that the value-added of use conversion is the main reason for the increase of land value,the value-added of external radiation and supply and demand are the second,and the proportion of value-added of direct investment is the smallest.The value-added that happens in the transfer link,accounting for up to 94%,is the focus of value-added income distribution study.(3)Under the framework of theoretical distribution,the farmers(collective)obtained the complete value of social security(part of the natural value-added I)and the natural value-added II by giving the farmland development rights value to the farmers.The proportion of farmers’ distribution was increased from 3.13%to 64.72%,exceeding the proportion of government distribution.The government obtained the artificial value-added I,part of the natural value-added I(the farmland social stability and ecological security value)and the natural value-added IIIThe amount of governments’ distribution decreased from 43.28 ten thousand per mu to 158.34 ten thousand per mu,and the proportion of governments’ distribution decreased from 96.87%to 35.28%. |
PDF Full Text Request