Study On The Reform's Risk Of Rural Collective Property Right System

With the development of China's agriculture,the "small-scale peasant economy"with scattered resources,scattered funds and scattered farmers is difficult to adapt to the needs of rural scale,organization,marketization and specialization.In recent years,Liupanshui City,Guizhou Province,based on the reform of the rural property rights system,actively carried out the experiment of "resource-changing assets,capital-changing shares,and farmers becoming shareholders "(hereinafter referred to as "three changes"),and exploring new ways of moderate-scale management of agriculture..Based on the reform of the "three changes" in Liupanshui rural area,this paper first defines and interprets the concepts of land transfer,"three changes" reform,reform risk,and farmers'rights.Based on the literature review of rural reform at home and abroad,this paper discusses The shortcomings of the existing research and the research direction of this paper.Secondly,through the case analysis,the inevitability of the "three changes" reform was discussed,and its main mode was summarized.The relevant theory was used to analyze the mechanism of the "three changes" reform.Through the analysis of the case,it was found that the "three changes" reform of Liupanshui took the a shareholding system cooperation" and the creation of "share farmers" as the core.Through the equity bond,the rural reform was promoted from"fission" to "fusion",which led to the rural collective economic organization.The re-engineering has found a breakthrough in promoting the structural reform of the supply side of agriculture,so that the superiority of the two-tier management system combined with the unified division can be more effectively exerted.The rural "three changes" reform is a creative measure with remarkable results.However,due to " unclear legal relations,non-agriculturalization of agricultural resources,and difficulty in quantifying collective assets",the "natural disaster risk and market fluctuation risk" Risks such as loss control risks,equity protection risks,and resource destruction risks.At present,the academic circles have little to do with the research on the risk prediction and prevention of the "three changes" reform.Starting from the characteristics of the "three changes" reform,this paper identifies and sorts out the risk points in the "three changes" reform.On this basis,it focuses on how to prevent risks and protect farmers' rights,from increasing agricultural insurance and improving the legal system.Preventive measures were taken in terms of strengthening process supervision and improving farmers' ability,and initially constructed a countermeasure system for risk prevention and protection of farmers' rights and interests in the rural“three changes”reform.In the aspect of risk identification and prevention,natural risks(drought,flood,hail,insect pests,etc.),market risks(poor management of agricultural products,unsalable agricultural products,unreasonable industrial establishment,improper use of resources,etc.),operational risks(corporate governance perspective),Moral hazard,legal risk,policy risk,and government risk are all risks that cannot be ignored.Improper prevention and disposal will directly lead to the failure of agricultural industrialization and affect rural economic and social development.The main countermeasures are:improve the risk prevention system such as agricultural insurance,improve the risk prevention ability of farmers;follow the basic principles of "equality,voluntary,benefit sharing,and risk exposure",and effectively protect the farmersy right to know and participate in production and management.Decision-making power,income right.Finally,in the conclusions and revelations,it is called for the "three changes" reform to play the leading role of the government,do a good job of risk prevention,and ensure the preservation and appreciation of farmers' asset resources and the maximization of farmers' interests.