| The report of the 19 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China emphasized that it is necessary to promote quality change,efficiency change,and dynamic change in economic development.In turn,China’s economic innovation and competitiveness will be enhanced.The scale of China’s high-tech industry has steadily expanded,and the characteristics of innovation and driving of industrial development have become increasingly evident.However,the characteristics of low-quality development of high-tech industries and unbalanced regional development are still very prominent.In order to promote high-quality,coordinated development of high-tech industries and enhance the efficiency of innovation in high-tech industries,this article is aimed at Zhejiang Province.It objectively evaluates the innovation capability of Zhejiang high-tech industry and explores a feasible path to further enhance Zhejiang’s innovation efficiency.At the same time,it also provides more Zhejiang practice and Zhejiang experience for the development of high-tech industries and efficiency in other provinces in the future.Firstly,this paper uses the two-stage DEA method.It divides the high-tech industry innovation process in 11 cities in Zhejiang Province into a research and development stage and an economic transformation stage.Then it observes the innovation efficiency of the two different stages in 2006-2016.Based on the above research,aiming at the low quality of high-tech industry development and the imbalance of regional development,this paper specifically explores the improvement path of Zhejiang high-tech industry innovation efficiency from the perspective of intellectual property layout and spatial spillover effects.In order to promote the high-quality development of high-tech industries,it has conducted research from the perspective of intellectual property layout.First,this paper establishes the index of intellectual property rights for high-tech industries in Zhejiang Province.Then it uses the intellectual property utilization ability as the core to establish the relationship between intellectual property utilization ability and intellectual property creation ability,intellectual property utilization demand,and intellectual property protection level.Finally,it uses the coupling coordination degree analysis method and the gray correlation analysis method to deal with the three groups.In order to promote the coordinated development of high-tech industries,the research studies the innovationefficiency of high-tech industries in Zhejiang Province from the spatial spillover effect.First,this paper conducts a spatial autocorrelation test on the two stages of the high-tech industry innovation process in Zhejiang Province.The results show that there is a strong correlation between the two stages of innovation efficiency and geospatial location.Then it constructs different weight matrix,and chooses the appropriate spatial measurement model.After data verification,this paper chooses to use the spatial Dubin model to analyze the spatial spillover effect.The research results show that there are mismatched input resources and redundant inputs in different cities in Zhejiang Province.The average efficiency of the economic transformation stage of high-tech industry innovation in Zhejiang Province is lower than that of the research and development stage.From the perspective of intellectual property layout,it can find that the mismatch between intellectual property utilization ability and intellectual property protection level is the most important reason for the low efficiency of innovation in the economic transformation stage.In addition,the innovation process of high-tech industry in zhejiang has obvious spatial spillover characteristics.However,there are large differences in spillover effects at different stages.In the research and development stage,the innovation efficiency has a positive spatial spillover effect,while the innovation efficiency in the economic transformation phase has a significant negative spillover effect.Finally,this paper gives specific suggestions from the perspectives of government resource allocation,intellectual property protection and regional coordinated development. |