Research On The Improvement Of Local Government Real Estate Public Policy Execution Power Under The Background Of "Housing,No Speculation"

China’s economy has shifted from a stage of rapid growth to a stage of high-quality development.High housing prices not only cause high leverage,but also distort social income distribution,especially increasing the cost of production and living,and stifling the entrepreneurial vitality of young people.The excessive development of real estate needs to be carefully reviewed by the government,and guided and restricted according to specific conditions.The 2016 Central Economic Work Conference made a clear positioning for the real estate market and pointed out that "houses are used for living,not for speculation." This further clarifies the development direction of my country’s property market,and at the same time promotes the pace of building a long-term management mechanism for the housing market.The goal of my country’s policy of "housing to live without speculation" is very clear,that is,to rationally curb speculative housing demand,return housing to its residential attributes,and ultimately promote the realization of "housing for housing" for all people.Under the background of this era,higher requirements have been put forward on the ability of local governments to implement public real estate policies.This research is based on T.B.Smith policy implementation model and stakeholder theory.By selecting Zhengzhou High-tech Zone as an entry point,from the perspective of the local government,it is constructed from the four main dimensions of policy formulation,executive agency,target group,and policy environment.The real estate public policy implementation analysis framework points out the specific content and internal logical connections of the four dimensions,analyzes and explores the difficulties in the implementation of the real estate public policy: delays in the formulation of real estate policies,selective implementation and unfavorable synergy of implementing agencies,and the target group in the government Policy indifference under behavioral anomie and imperfect evaluation mechanism of publicity and interaction feedback are the reasons for the problems in the implementation of housing policy.Based on the analysis framework,two cases of Chongqing model and Changsha model are selected for empirical research,and the highlights of the implementation of public real estate policies in the two cities are sorted out,combining these four dimensions,namely,policy formulation,executive agency,target group,and policy environment To conduct comparative analysis of cases,and on the basis of summing up experience,put forward targeted suggestions on how to promote the implementation of local government real estate public policies,so as to effectively ensure the healthy and stable development of the real estate industry,and avoid blind development of the real estate industry and improper government intervention.The consequences of coming risks.