| Based on reviewing academic achievements and determining relevant concepts and theories,it concludes that the cause of rural hollowing is mainly due to the incomplete land management system,imbalance of urban and rural development,the blind project of village combination and the reform of household registration system.Rural hollowing has brought great challenges to grassroots governance,mainly manifested as the lack of governance subjects,the shortage of authority in grass-root governance,the deficiency of public-service and the reduction of public-spirit.It has been expounded the new village movement in South Korean,village-made movement in Japan and Chinese Fengqiao experience in order to contrast different governance models under different administrative ecology.Executive-led model,autonomous model and Co-Governance model have their own advantages,however,combining with Chinese administrative ecology,it is found that the last one is more suitable for Chinese national and village conditions.As a result,first and foremost,shaping the pattern of multi-subjects participation to cope with the absence of governance organs.So it need emphasize the importance of producing a marked effect by the internal subjects,external subjects and associative subjects.Besides,reshaping the grass-roots authority by improving the structure of governance and repositioning the public and private power boundary.What’s more,it is supposed to grasp the administrative ecology to make full use of the government function in top-design and guide all subjects to participate in the public service supply.Last but not least,taking measures to promote the integration of three governance is also important.The modernization of grass-roots governance system and governance capacity will be accelerated through simultaneous efforts and measures. |