| With the progress and development of the times,the combination of education and productive labor has increasingly adapted to the development direction of socialism with Chinese characteristics since it entered a new era.Paying attention to the ideological research of the combination of education and productive labor has become an inevitable choice for the education policy of the Party and the country in the new era.Therefore,according to the objective reality of China’s development and the background at home and abroad,exploring Marx’s thought of combining education with productive labor can provide scientific theoretical guidance for realizing China’s economic and social strategic goals in the new period.Starting from the historical background of the early development of capitalist mode of production,and based on the situation that capitalists mercilessly oppressed and destroyed the working class and their children and could not receive education,Marx made an in-depth study on the combination of education and productive labor,and published a series of important discussions.Marx’s thought of the combination of education and productive labor contains two connotations: one is the combination of modern productive labor and education,the other is the combination of modern education and productive labor.On the necessity of combining modern productive labor with education,it is mainly the nature of socialized large-scale production and large industry that requires workers to have the quality and ability of all-round development.The necessity of the combination of modern education and productive labor mainly lies in that the development of modern education should meet the needs of people’s all-round development under the condition of socialized mass production.Marx also pointed out that the combination of education and productive labor is of great significance to change the alienation of labor in the capitalist mode of production and the separation of bourgeois education from productive labor.Marx expounded the functions of the combination of education and productive labor: improving social productivity,promoting the modernization of education,bringing up all-round development of people,and promoting the transformation of modern society.Marx also explored the practical path and process of the combination of education and productive labor.Marx’s thought of the combination of education and productive labor has the important characteristics of value,sociality,historicity and scientificity.Marx’s thought of combining education with productive labor takes the realization of man’s free and all-round development as its fundamental purpose.Marx’s Thought on the combination of education and productive labor has so far sparkled with theoretical value: it established the first theoretical system on the combination of education and productive labor in the history of Marxist development,highlighted the leading position of education in the modernization construction and the great significance of labor in education,and helped to promote the development of educational theory in the new era It is helpful to promote the development of the theory of socialist modernization;It is also of practical significance to the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era: it is conducive to promoting the process of building a socialist modern country in an all-round way,to building a modern education power,to promoting innovation and development,and to realizing the all-round development of human beings.China’s socialist modernization and educational development have entered a new stage.In the new stage,new goals are put forward,and new problems are also faced.At this important historical juncture,studying and comprehending Marx’s thought of combining education with productive labor can provide important enlightenment for us to achieve new goals and solve new problems,and also enable us to stand at the tide of the times,broaden our international horizons,grasp the general trend of development,enhance our quality and ability,and shoulder the historical responsibility. |