Research On The Construction Of The Risk Assessment Index System For The Teaching Of Physical Education Majors In Colleges And Universities

In order to better understand the nature of the risk of strying teaching,reduce the risk of strying teaching,improve the risk consciousness,avoid the hidden dangers of teaching,successfully achieve the expected teaching objectives,and ensure the safe and good conduct of strying teaching.this paper uses literature methods,expert interviews,mathematical statistics,questionnaires,logic analysis and other methods,with the university physical education major teaching risk as the research object,to determine the evaluation index,At the same time,the use of hierarchical analysis of its weight calculation and analysis,the establishment of an indicator system,and the use of the construction of the evaluation scale to assess the teaching risks of college sports majors teaching risk,the evaluation results and expert weight assignment results are more consistent,empirical feedback results are reasonable,divided into the following three aspects of conclusions:1.Combined with expert interview results and Delphi method After further demonstration of the risk index system,four first-level indicators,teacher factors,student factors,natural environment factors,school management factors were formed.The 11 secondary indicators are teachers' teaching ability,teaching level,teaching style,students' knowledge risk,behavior risk,their own physical condition or ability,discipline risk,natural environment,site equipment and facilities,people's management,management of things.Thirty-six three-level indicators constitute a risk assessment index system for teaching and risk assessment of high-efficiency sports majors.2.Using the hierarchical analysis method to calculate the weight of each evaluation index,the first-level weight ingressment results show that the student factor(0.3827)teacher factor(0.3462)school management factor(0.1642),environmental factors(0.1068).The results of the second-level indicator weight ranking are the management C11(0.0821)management C11(0.0821)management of the management c10(0.0821)of the student's own ability or condition risk C6(0.1614)teacher teaching ability C3(0.1499)student discipline risk C7(0.0873)0.0821)Site Equipment Facility C9(0.0801)Student Behavior Risk C5(0.0595)Knowledge Risk C4(0.0354)Teaching Style C2(0.0349)Natural Environment C11(0.0267).3.The use of list sorting method for the university sports professional teaching risk of comprehensive assessment,according to the risk weight ranking is the highest student factors,followed by teacher factors,environmental factors,school management factors,the results of the evaluation and expert weight ingenuity results are more consistent,empirical feedback results are reasonable,but in order,There is a slight difference in the amount of risk,which has a certain effect on improving the quality of teaching and deepening the understanding of the essence of education.