Research On The Strategies Of Judicial Organs To Deal With Legal Network Public Opinions

With the development of self-media,the public has become more and more involved in judicial activities.Judicial information or judicial cases are received by the public through media reports,and then they express their views and opinions through online platforms to exercise their right to freedom of expression,supervision or to defend their rights and interests.Many public opinion cases in recent years have been known to the public through online platforms,such as the Kunshan Long anti-killing case,the Yu Huan mother-shaming murder case,and the Tangshan barbecue restaurant beating incident.However,such influence includes both positive and negative ones.Positive online public opinion can promote judicial justice and judicial openness,but negative online public opinion can affect judges’ independent trial,and if the judiciary responds to public opinion inappropriately,it can also damage judicial credibility to a certain extent.Therefore,judicial organs should actively face online public opinion and improve their ability to respond to online public opinion,so as to improve judicial credibility and judicial authority.Therefore,the research purpose of this paper is: under the background of promoting Chinese modernization and the whole process of people’s democracy,how the judicial organs respond to the network public opinion related to the law to achieve the balanced development of judicial independence and public opinion supervision,improve judicial authority,and promote the perfection of the society ruled by law.Combining a large number of cases of law-related public opinion,this paper discusses the reasons and jurisprudential basis for judicial organs to respond to law-related online public opinion from the relevant concepts and characteristics,analyzes the positive and negative impacts of law-related online public opinion on judicial activities,and then finds shortcomings in the current situation of judicial organs to respond to online public opinion at the present stage in China,such as judicial openness does not achieve the desired effect,and the whole process of judicial openness still needs to be improved.The court system also lacks a mature response system including public opinion early warning,collection,research and judgment,disposal and feedback,which is not conducive to capturing public opinion quickly,lacking cooperation among various departments in responding to online public opinion,poor information interoperability,lacking standards for research and judgment of online public opinion,so that it cannot respond to online public opinion in a targeted manner,and the application of the press spokesperson and post-judgment Q&A system also fails to achieve the desired effect.Finally,solutions are explored for these problems,such as implementing full-process judicial disclosure,focusing on the quality and comprehensiveness of the content of judicial information disclosure,establishing a regular interactive mechanism to listen to public opinion,improving the quality of the reasoning of adjudication documents,and effectively using live internet court hearings to prevent the emergence of secondary public opinion.At the same time,it is also necessary to establish a complete system for responding to online public opinion,clarify the criteria for research and judgment,set up a database of online public opinion to summarize the response experience,and give full play to the role of the spokesperson system and the post-judgment question-and-answer system to enhance the feedback effect on online public opinion,with a view to enlightening the judicial organs in responding to online public opinion.