Research On The Influence Of Rural Collective Property Rights System Reform On Farmers’ Income

The reform of the rural collective property rights system is a long-term and comprehensive major institutional innovation deployed by the Party Central Committee,The ultimate goal of the reform is to increase farmers’ income and continuously enhance farmers’ sense of gain.The increase of farmers’ income has always been a core issue,which is of great significance to China’s agricultural development.The reform will further clarify the rural collective assets by checking assets and verifying membership status,converting them into shares and quantifying them to people,making farmers into shareholders,adding more methods to increase farmers’ income,and ultimately achieving the goal of increasing farmers’ income and the continuous development of agriculture and rural areas..This thesis mainly studies the impact of the reform of rural collective property rights system on farmers’ income.Taking Liupanshui,Guizhou Province as an example,combined with relevant theories,it explains the current situation of rural collective property rights system reform,clarifies the operation mechanism of reform on farmers’income,and conducts theoretical analysis..In terms of empirical research,based on the survey data of Liupanshui City,Guizhou Province,it especially analyzes whether the reform of rural collective property rights system has an impact on farmers’ income,and selects three village in Liupanshui City,Guizhou Province for case analysis,and studies the basic development of the property rights system of village collectives.situation and patterns,and the effect of reforms on farmers’ incomes.Through the research of case analysis and empirical analysis,further draw the corresponding conclusions,and put forward relevant countermeasures and suggestions according to the conclusions.The following are the main conclusions of this study:First,this thesis takes farmers’ property income as the explained variable,and the explanatory variable is whether to participate in the "three changesr" reform.The DID model is used for empirical analysis.(2)The empirical analysis shows that the "three changes" reform has a significant positive impact on property income,and the age and health of the main family decision makers have a significant positive impact on farmers’property income.The results of model(1)and model(2)are consistent,indicating that the results are more robust.The second is to replace wage income,total household income,and household net income with the dependent variable property income according to the robustness test,assuming that the policy implementation is still effective.Wage income,total household income and household net income are significant at the 1%,10%,and 1%confidence levels,respectively.Among them,the education level of the main decision makers of the labor force and the family has a significant positive impact on the three incomes.Age and gender have significant negative effects on wage income.For total household income and net income,total household population has a significant positive impact.Thirdly,according to the case analysis,it is concluded that the income and employment level of farmers in Shepang Village,Yanbo Village and Yanjiao Village are developing in the direction of growth.The management and development model of the three village collectives can effectively promote the development of local agricultural enterprises,characteristic agriculture and leisure tourism,provide employment opportunities for local farmers,and at the same time further encourage local farmers to open farmhouses,canteens,etc.Promote the income of farmers.From the above conclusions,we can know that the reform has an impact on farmers’income.This thesis puts forward the following countermeasures and suggestions through the research conclusions.One is to deepen farmers’ awareness through publicity.The second is to reasonably guarantee the rights and interests of farmers.The third is to promote the sustainable development of the local tourism industry.The fourth is to further develop and expand the new collective economy.Fifth,continue to strengthen the supervision of reform.