| As an important institutional investor in the financial market,the insurance asset management company has gradually strengthened its influence on economy and finance because of its own business characteristics and the expanding scale of funds entrusted for management,and its social responsibility performance is worth considering.In addition to ordinary social responsibilities such as improving profits,paying taxes and promoting employment,insurance asset management companies should also undertake special social responsibilities such as responding to national strategies,paying attention to the basic trend of social development,actively supporting the development of the real economy and serving key projects.At present,there are many researches on the social responsibility of insurance companies in insurance companies,but there are few researches on the social responsibility of insurance asset management companies,and there is no concrete and operable social responsibility evaluation system for insurance asset management companies.On the basis of analyzing the connotation of social responsibility of insurance asset management companies,guided by corporate citizenship theory,iron law of responsibility theory and stakeholder theory,this paper draws lessons from the research of relevant experts and scholars on social responsibility of insurance companies,insurance asset management companies and corporate social responsibility evaluation,and selects 30 evaluation indicators from five dimensions: organizational governance,employee rights and interests,operation management,environmental protection and community development,and obtains insurance asset management through Delphi method,coefficient of variation method and Rcluster.Based on the data obtained from the annual information disclosure reports of insurance asset management companies in 2021,related party transaction information reports,official website of China Insurance Asset Management Association and other sources,this paper evaluates the social responsibility level of seven insurance asset management companies by using the antagonistic interpretation structure model method,and compares the ranking of social responsibility of insurance asset management companies with the ranking of asset management scale.The final ranking is: PA Asset Management > TK Asset Management > RB Asset Management > GS Asset Management > TB Asset Management > XH Asset Management > TP Asset Management.There is a big gap between the ranking of GS Asset Management social responsibility and the ranking of asset management scale,and the ranking of the other two groups is basically the same.The parent company of GS Asset Management has set up two insurance asset management institutions with different business directions,which has an impact on the overall score of GS Asset Management social responsibility.Finally,based on the comprehensive research results,this paper puts forward that insurance asset management companies can improve their social responsibility management level by improving their social responsibility work system;Do a good job in enterprise management and continuously create social value;Protect the legitimate rights and interests of employees,and integrate the development of enterprises and employees;Suggestions on increasing green investment,helping to achieve the goal of "double carbon" and actively fulfilling social responsibilities. |