On The Synergy Governance Dynamic Mechanism Of Urban Community

Based on the dynamic condition and running mechanism, the whole papersupports a clear clue of the evolvement history of the urban community synergygovernance, and it pays great emphasis on the exploration of the source of dynamic andthe operation process of synergy governance. It takes the consideration that the dynamicof synergy governance mainly comes from the interests-demand of the main powerbody that varies from the different organization. The key factor of synergy governancenot only lies in the dynamic condition of the community, but also focuses on the runningmechanism of the main power body. We can realize the orderly interaction and the mosteffective synergy of main power body in the community, through the innovation ofdynamic mechanism of urban community synergy governance, to achieve goodgovernance of urban community.The whole paper consists of five parts.The first part, it concludes theoretical basis and research status. This part analysesthe relative theories of the topic, from the main points of governance theory to the keypoints of synergy governance theory---- synergy governance is the development ofgovernance theory that emphasize on the diversification of the subject of governanceand the interactivity of governance system; to get the main characters of urban synergygovernance by network governance theory----the endogenous of the goal of governance,the diversification of power subject, delayering of organizational structure, theinteractivity of the form of governance, graduality of the process of governance; tocomment the domestic and western research of urban political power mechanism, to getthe theoretic support to pursue the deeper dynamic mechanism of power mechanism, thegoal of the community synergy governance not only to make the society to control the power comes true, but the innovation of power of society; to describe the actor networktheory to give an idea of the dynamic mechanisms.synergy governance----questionpresenting, interest given, mobilization, handling objections. At last, it researches thedomestic and western research status to give the reference and find the creative point ofthe research.The second part, it concludes the background of urban community synergygovernance. It introduces the several western typical governance models, based on thedifferent emphasis from national and local government level to bring into play theadvantage of synergy governance by analyzing the background of synergy governance.The typical governance models are'community self-government model in New York',the'government-led model in Singapore', the'mixed governance model in Tokyo'. Thetypical practicing models in China are:'government-led community governancepractice in Shanghai', the'resident self–government community governance practice inShenyang', the'cooperation community governance practice in Wuhan', the'service-oriented community governance practice in Qingdao'. Both the national leveland the city trial pay more attention to the community governance, it is good forbringing into play the advantage of every power body, to inspire the creativity of society,to realize the accordance and flexibility of the nodes in the synergy network, to get thepolitical legitimacy, to integrate the social resources.The third part, it concludes the power body, dynamic sources and running process.By analyses the nature of the power body, it dwells on the dynamic mechanism ofsynergy governance---- dynamic sources based on the operating process of actornetwork theory. It divides the power body into government organizations, socialorganizations, corporation organizations, and it describes the present situation of them.The dynamic of synergy governance have three circumstances: interest driving, decreeforcing and the social psychological identification. The running process of synergynetwork is: in the question presenting phase, the core actor make the goal, to build thecommunication mechanism; in the interest given phase to build the synergy relationship,to give the power of actors; in the mobilization phase, the core actors use power tosynergize with other actors to participate the community governance activities; in handling objections phase, the objection representatives resolve the differences andcooperate every interests.The fourth part, it concludes the case study of dynamic mechanism synergygovernance. It takes KN community of Zhuhai as a case and makes full analysis of thedynamic sources and running process, and it points that the possible resistance ofsynergy governance network. According to the classification of the power body, thegovernment organizations of KN community are the dispatched street committees andresidents'committees of district government, the street committees is the main part. Thesocial organizations of KN conclude the owners'committees, private non-enterpriseorganizations and the volunteer organizations. The enterprise organizations in KNcommunity contain two types: service companies and merchants, the service companiesis the main part. The power body's interest demand still depends on interest driving,decree forcing and the social psychological identification. According to the actornetwork theory, the the core actor in question presenting phase----communitycommittees given power by the street committee use the'community partyorganization','community service centers','community committee'trinity communitysynergy governance mode, the community party organization sets the goal and build thecommunication mechanism, party branch secretary is responsible for the coordination,listening to the residents complaints, understanding their needs. In the interest givenphase, community party organization centers on the need of the residents to organizedifferent types of democratic autonomy, by procedure of park, community forums, andso on, to give the power to every actor. The mobilization phase is to paly the role ofparty members's leading role in the owners'committee, volunteer organization, propertyservice companies, social work service institutions and council, party member forum,and so on. Handling objections phase, the representor who are good at organization andcommunication to resolve the interest difference and coordinate the interest. If there aremany cooperating partners need synergy, the timely information communication canenhance the interactive understanding and forgiveness, to a certain extent to relieve thepressure to keep the stabilization. The possible resistances of the synergy network are:the influence of ideology, the difference of interest demand, the difference of value and the instability of power relationship, and so on.The fifth part, it concludes the power trend of the community synergy governance.This part predicts certain future developing trend of the urban community synergygovernance. It pays attention to the construction of the public square for theactors'participation in the community politics, which gives the corresponding authorityof every type of organizations and personnel in the community, and predicts the changeof the relationship between different main-power-bodies. It pays special attention to thepower trend of the core actors of synergy governance: on the preconditions of the nochange of the goal of the community political power mechanism, but with the change ofthe concrete task assignment, the core actors'role can be changed and the residentself-government organization can also become the core actors to handle certain event.We should pay attention to the interest requirement of other organizations with theempathy, pay attention to the search of community's elites and pay emphasis on theeffect of Charisma personality.To sum up, the research of this topic believes that for the synergy governance ofthe community, we should not only pay attention to the active factors of dynamicsources, but also pay attention to the synergy operation process of communitygovernance. The whole process determines the result of governance. Thus, we shouldbuild the orderly interaction and the most effective synergy of dynamic mechanism, torealize the good development of community, eventually to achieve good governance ofurban community.