On Justice Of Public Selection

The harmonious society is the common enterprise of all the people, the ethical community with the common enterprise as the universal medium. The ethical relationship of the harmonious society is in non-dominance with harmoniousness but difference and harmoniousness to bear things as both sides. Citizens enjoy equal membership in the harmonious society, and equal rights of common possession, sharing and governance to the common enterprise. Building up the harmonious society needs the government to play the role of meta-governance, perform good governance, build up outstanding leader groups, cultivate remarkable leader-cadre teams, innovate institutions of selecting and appointing leader cadres. The Institution of Public Selecting Leader Cadre(sIPSLC)adapts to these requirements. The theme of the IPSLC is its institution, whose essence is assigning justice but not allocating and distributing justice, whose aim is the goodness of leaders individual and collective and it is realized through the two-layer justice of the IPSLC itself and its running.The public environment is the beginning of public selection, the initial conditions set before public selection, and is also a rational fact. The more the environment is public, the more the public selection will realize justice. The public environment of public selection is a veil of sunshine in openness, reality and commonness, which is designed according to the reasons to judge the match between the leader cadre and the public selecting leader position. It includes two regulations: one is that all information relating to public selection is made public, the other is that the process of public selection is made public in organization. The sunshine veil includes the objective and subjective conditions, and the former consists of matter, regulation and situation of IPSLC, the later consists of intentions of the leader cadres participating in public selection, the vocational public selecting functionaries, the masses supervising public selection. So the public environment is more complicated than that of John Rawls.The basic contents of public selecting justice is four kinds of justice linking one by one, namely qualifying justice, contending justice, examining justice and matching justice. The qualifying justice is the equality in qualification and before the minimum selecting criteria for the public selecting leader position, and not careering equality opening to talents. It recognizes and respects differences in qualification, and supplies spaces for qualities to exhibit themselves freely. Contending justice means to select outstanding leader cadres. Contending justice emphasized the fairness of IPSLC which is not only in forms before contending regulations but in essence before the leader qualities the public selecting leader position requires. The contending justice has two meanings from methodology and teleology, and so expects fairness when contending excellence. But because of the inherent limitation of the contending system itself, it forms intrinsic intension with the contending justice, which needs to be made up by examining justice. Examining justice regards the mass general recognition as the standard, which can defend externally and justify internally. Based on objective facts, the mass valuation is the just appraisal to the leader cadres. The mass valuation is apt to result in collective dilemma for their own intentions, and need to better mass appraisal forms and strengthen the obligation of unit holding mass appraisal. The matching justice should follow the core value principle of socialism to match men and positions suitably. As to the excellent candidate, benefits should be made up to ensure the talented used effectively and assigned reasonably.Ideas of compound equality, goodness of public selection and public rationality, they three run through the fours links of public selection. Compound equality is the essence of public selecting justice being as an assigning justice, and has historical and non-modelling characteristics. Compound equality means that equality is the common idea of justice of all public selection links, and yet different from one another, its basis lies in each link of public selection but not the IPSLC. Public selecting justice is realized with the idea of public selecting goodness as the guidance, and aim at the goodness of public selection, which is characterized with publicity, trueness and valuableness. Public selection regards truth as goodness, or the publicity of public selecting goodness is just truth. Trueness is the concrete stipulation of public selecting goodness, includes validity, rightness, sincerity. Trueness of public selecting goodness is of value, not only the value of aim but of method, and has the capacity to judge the fitness between the public selecting leader cadres and the public selecting leader positions. The public selection strives for trueness to realize the value aim of public selecting justice, which is the result of all citizens making use of public sense. Public sense used in public selection is in forms of public proof and false to make positive justification and negative defence for public selecting trueness. But the function of public sense is limited, and needs public rationality to make up.To realize public selecting justice needs to design scientific and reasonable institutions. The institution of public selecting justice is different from the public selecting system in experiences. The institution of public selecting justice is a kind of public structure, which consists of four elements including experts, citizens, functionaries in vocational public selection and political leaders, expressing the principle of CCP. governing cadres and the spirit of socialist republicanism, characterized with mixedness and balance. The institution of public selecting justice takes democratic deliberation as the main action model, which can be divided into practical deliberation, ethical deliberation and moral deliberation, which runs in two different procedures. The ideal environment of public selecting deliberation is made up of principles of deliberative procedures and discussions. The public selecting deliberation's smoothly carrying on needs experts, citizens, functionaries in vocational public selection and political leaders to perform their citizen duties which include resourcefulness and courageousness, promise to heart, publicity to public selection.The effectiveness of public selecting justice is the product of running effects of the institution of public selecting justice and can be divided into direct and overflowing ones. The former is that of public selecting actions, and the later is that of the institution of public selecting justice. The former mainly reflects in assigning the leader positions. But the institution of public selecting justice is imperfect procedural justice, and forms intension with public selecting justice. The key to realize the direct effectiveness of public selecting justice lies in influxing perfect procedural factors into the imperfect procedure so that more inevitable cause-effect relationship could be built up between the institution of public selecting justice and public selecting justice. The later depends on the overflowing effectiveness, embodies in development of public selecting culture and enlargement of latent leader cadres. That public selection cultivates its objects will be the unexhausted power source with which the institution of public selecting justice develops excellently. As long as the institution of public selecting justice gains powers of continuous innovation and that of common governance from public selecting justice, we can expect reasonably that IPSLC will be the main part of cadre selecting and appointing institution in our country, and the most scientific and advanced selecting and appointing institution in history.