| The economy theoretical dispute of the advance and retreat of the state-owned hasbeen going on for a long time, and getting worse. Abroad, the "Washington consensus"as the theoretical basis to the neo-liberal doctrine, the implementation of privatizationin transition countries in the world,after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russiasuffered. In China, some people was pointed out that “the government does not reformthe state-owned economy that will not be able to achieve common prosperity,"the wayof reform is" to promote the market-oriented reform of state-owned economy”,"thestate-owned enterprises must retreat from the competitive industry."”State-ownedenterprises should be more clear boundary, suitable to the provision of public goodsand quasi-public goods that can not give full play to the market mechanism,"“thestate-owned enterprises is different from the general government and publicinstitutions for general corporate,state-owned enterprises should not be profitobjectives should be targeted to achieve social welfare."for the reform of state-ownedenterprises to set two ultimate goals that:" First, the state-owned enterprise into anonprofit public law companies; Second, the establishment of the constitutionalgovernance of state-owned assets architecture to achieve the ultimate objectives of thereform of state-owned enterprises, state-owned enterprises from the field of for-profit(rather than from the competitive field) and gradually withdraw, they think that thecapitalization of state-owned assets, especially in the early stage of China’s economictransformation, not has the logic inevitability, but has positive significance to promotethe market. However, with the establishment of the market economy in China, thecapital of state-owned assets into state-owned enterprise reform, its historic missionwill end."That the Chinese state-owned enterprise reform historical mission only promote market-oriented "With the establishment of China’s market economy, theprofitability of state-owned enterprises should die. What is more, the World BankReport2030: building a modern, harmonious, creative, high-income society "surfacethat help China to build a modern, harmonious, creative, high-income social advice, inessence, that is once again aired the "Washington consensus" and privatization. As weall know, the superstructure and the economic basis of the conflict will lead to serioussocial discord, the superstructure to adapt to the economic base, but the change of theeconomic foundation to be subject to the superstructure the time nodes near theso-called "middle-income trap", only " simple market-oriented middle class "," toreduce the access threshold for financial, petrochemical, power, telecommunicationsand other industries, public resources should all (or most) for public goods andservices "means reform, the most direct result of the larger conflict caused by theeconomic base and the superstructure."Rural high school to provide free educationpolicy,""the government should provide more information, strengthen supervisionpolicy reference, but a thorough reform of the" neo-liberal "way of thinking, the onlyChinese band to capitalism ", and this economic base and superstructure seriousconflict must be an even greater crisis will bring to China. This paper aims to find thechoice of the ideal and the reality about the China’s development path, based on theresearch of traditional economic theory, we find more thickness, more convincingtheory of state-owned enterprises, and look back at history to find more to understandthe reform of the reality of the state-owned enterprises. In order to establish theimportance of state-owned enterprises and state-owned enterprises retreat directlyassociated with China’s development path. And, based on the first-mover advantageand new structural economics, how state-owned enterprises structured to lead-China’sdevelopment path. Papers specific contents are as follows:Chapter Ⅰ reviewed the literature and grouped those into two categories:privatization paradigm and public ownership paradigm. Article what is the purpose ofthe conclusion of the privatization paradigm almost can be summarized for theweakening of the state-owned enterprises, state-owned enterprises is only part of the state-owned economy, in order to compensate for market failure; public ownershipparadigm is contrary to privatization paradigm, state-owned enterprises is an importantcomponent of the state-owned economy with the nature of the ownership by the wholepeople, business people.Chapter Ⅱ starting from the privatization paradigm and proposed state-ownedenterprises in the theoretical attribution, state-owned enterprises were the role of leaderof the mandatory system. Recalling the market economic theory since Adam Smith,the wealth of the sovereign or state-owned wealth were only market supplement thatachieve a well-functioning market for protection purpose. And monopoly, externalitiesand information asymmetry always threaten the good functioning of the market, thedevelopment of new institutional economics or transaction cost paradigm purposed toaddress this issue. This paper will restatement the Coase law and state-ownedenterprises to lead the mandatory institutional change theory.Chapter Ⅲ reviews the history and current situation of China’s state-ownedenterprises. Conduct (C) to be based on the structure (S) and the pattern, reform mustbe based on the reality and conditions. Large-scale state-owned enterprises havealready been exists, and experienced a long period of reform and accumulation.Understanding the the realistic formation process is conducive to a betterunderstanding the actual situation, only a clear grasp of the actual situation be possibleto make good use of the theory, and learn from the successful experience of othercountries.Chapter Ⅳ was about a large number of state-owned enterprises, the integrationof public ownership and the market economy. The advance and retreat of thestate-owned enterprises coupled with the development road of socialism with Chinesecharacteristics, the integrity of the research object is constructed.Chapter Ⅴ based on the data and theoretical analysis, to study on the totalproportion, important industry accounting, profit accounting, tax burden and so on.The state-owned enterprises have no way to retreat. That is difficult to ensure controlover the even affect social nature. Chapter Ⅵ, the advance and retreat of the state-owned enterprises should bebased on the degree of realization of public ownership of state-owned enterprises. Ifstate-owned enterprises should be performed, the state-owned enterprises must reflectthe nature of the greater public ownership. Talking about the social nature is notenough to get the support.Chapter Ⅶ, state-owned enterprises shoud been lead the development of the road.The specific contents include that: the potential significance of the revitalization of theequipment manufacturing industry, the revitalization of the equipment manufacturingindustry, and the philosophy and the reality of harmony, the whole ownership nature ofthe state-owned enterprises to achieve harmonious development road of socialism withChinese characteristics.Chapter Ⅷ, the leading mandatory institutional change theory andendowment-based of state-owned enterprises-the scientific and technologicalrevolution has brought opportunities. The economics of the new structure talk aboutthe era limitations of economic development and structural stimulating economicgrowth, but inadequate discussed the characteristics of the endowment in times.Whether in the endowment or institutional change, the overflow is the key of theleading of state-owned enterprises. Development and reform will create friction thatcauses loss, if you want to achieve the purpose of the reform and development, theremust be more impetus, and those will be bring by the scientific and technologicalrevolution that bring more profit as surplus driving force of sources, and will be thecurrent advance of state-owned enterprises or state-owned enterprises the structurallead the important direction. |
PDF Full Text Request