Formation And Effect Of Cultural Industry

Spatial agglomeration is an important feature of the cultural industries, and cultural industries competition between regions has evolved into the competition between cultural industries cluster, so, industrial agglomeration becomes new research trend of cultural industries. Do the dynamic factors of the traditional industry agglomeration, such as increasing return, externality, knowledge spillover and transaction cost, apply to the cultural industries? What is the agglomeration effect of cultural industries? Taking cultural industries agglomeration mechanism and effect as the research object, applying and integrating the new classical economics, new economic geography, new institutional economics and new economic sociology and the theory of industrial organization, and combining with the characteristics of the cultural industries, this paper studies the cultural industries agglomeration mechanism and influence factors, and analyzes the agglomeration economy effect, the innovation effect and urban space update effect from the cultural industries agglomeration, and empirically tests the cultural industries agglomeration influence factors and agglomeration effect on the basis of china’s cultural industries data. This research has important theoretical significance and practical value on for richening the research of cultural industries agglomeration mechanism and effect, guiding china’s culture industries agglomeration cultivation and realizing agglomeration effect.In this paper, the main content and innovative research findings are summarized as follows:1. From the research perspective of the division of labor evolution and the industrial organization changing, taking the cultural industries agglomeration as an intermediate organization, based on historical evolution of culture industries production organization, this paper sets up an analytical framework on division of labor, transaction efficiency and cultural industries agglomeration, and reveals the division organization efficiency of cultural industries agglomeration by constructing a labor division income-cost model. The research shows that:the externalities and increasing return from the division of labor is the basic driving force of cultural industries agglomeration, and Agglomeration is beneficial to realize the labor division income and promote the evolution of the division of labor by increasing transaction efficiency, so, division of labor and industrial agglomeration promote each other; As a kind of organization form, cultural industries agglomeration provides an efficient labor division organization arrangement, and effectively fill the efficiency gap between the enterprise pure market organization and enterprise hierarchy organization.2. Based on the new classical trade theory, new economic geography, new institutional economics and new economic sociology, this paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework of multiple perspectives on the cultural industries agglomeration influence factors, and applies spatial econometrics model to empirically test the influence factors using the provincial cultural industries data of china. The results show that:(1) China’s cultural industries has obviously spatial agglomeration and positive spatial correlation, and from the industry, industry agglomeration degree of radio, television and film production, art performances, cultural entertainment is higher.(2)Eastern regions have geographical advantages and cultural resources enriched areas have comparative advantage of cultural industries agglomeration, but under the control of the new economic geography factor influences, the new classical trade factor has no significant influence on cultural industries agglomeration.(3)The new economic geography factors have powerful explanation on cultural industries agglomeration, and cultural consumption demand, cultural enterprise quantity, human capital level and diversity in the region have significant positive influence on cultural industries agglomeration.(4) Institutional factor can partly explain cultural industries agglomeration, government’s fiscal support promotes cultural industries agglomeration, whereas financial service and park policy have no significant influence on cultural industries agglomeration.(5) The social capital based on the trust has significant positive effect on cultural industries agglomeration.3. Based on the analysis of the mechanism of the cultural industries agglomeration and the economic growth, from two aspects of the cultural industries growth and culture industries efficiency, this paper empirically tests the economy effect of culture industry agglomeration. The results show that:(1)There is circular and accumulative causal relation between the culture industry agglomeration and the economic growth.(2)The empirical test of the industry growth effect from cultural industries agglomeration shows that:China’s regional cultural industries growth has obviously spatial correlation, and the regional disparity of Chinese cultural industries is obvious, but the interregional cultural industries development has convergence trend; The cultural industries agglomeration has significant industry growth effect, and localization economies and urbanization economies all obviously promote cultural industries growth, but the cultural enterprise internal scale economy effect is not significant, and moreover, The cultural industries agglomeration has spatial spillover effect, which can promote the cultural industries growth of the adjacent regions.(3) The empirical test of the industry efficiency effect from cultural industries agglomeration shows that:From2004to2010, the cultural industries efficiency of china presents steady growth trend, moreover, technical efficiency and pure technical efficiency has significant regional disparity; urbanization economies are the main dynamic of culture industry efficiency improvement of china, and The enterprise internal scale economy has no significant influence on cultural industries efficiency improvement, and localization economies influence on cultural industries efficiency has regional differences.4. From the perspective of network structure, this paper analyzes the cultural industries agglomeration network structure influence on cultural enterprise innovation performance. The results show that:(1) Cultural industries agglomeration has the economic relation network and social relation network mutual nested "double network" attribute, geographic concentration is the space requirement of mutually reinforcing "double network" operation.(2) Culture and art agglomeration network, cultural tourism agglomeration network and cultural creative agglomeration network has different network structure.(3) Cultural industrial agglomeration network structure has significant influence on enterprise innovation performance, namely that cultural enterprise, locating in the network center and having rich structure holes, has better innovation performance, and network connection strength and quality are main determinants of innovation performance differences, and to culture enterprises having different ability for knowledge absorption, the network position and network connection influences on the innovation performance are different.5. Based on the perspective of interactive relationship between the cultural industries park and urban renewal, this paper analyzes the interactive mechanism and typical interactive model between cultural industries park and urban renewal, taking cultural industries park as cultural production and consumption composite space comprised of physical space, industrial space and image space, and constructs the spatial effect evaluation framework of cultural industries park under the background of urban renewal, and evaluates urban space effect of Xi’an Qujiang Cultural Industries Demonstration District. The results show that:(1) The interactive mechanism exists between the cultural industry park and urban renewal, and the originally declining urban space becomes space capital of cultural creative production, and attracts culture creative personnel and culture enterprise to cluster, thereby, the city space is renewed and image of the city is promoted.(2) The cultural and art district mode dominated by artist, the government leading culture industries district mode, and the independent culture industries new district mode are obvious differences in urban renewal power, space location, space production and management, culture industry type and urban renewal effect.(3) The construction of physical space and image space is basically successful for Qujiang Cultural Industries Demonstration District, and cultural production space characterized by spatial agglomeration should be strengthened.