Research On The Performance Of Precision Poverty Alleviation Project In Qinba Mountainous Area Of Shaanxi Province

Poverty reduction and poverty eradication is a common problem faced by all countries in the world,a major topic of global concern and research.After several years of active implementation,what about the implementation effect of poverty policy is? What lessons are worth learning in alleviating relative poverty? Only by accurate evaluation we can grasp the performance of the policy implementation,timely find its problems and summarize its experience,and then make timely and appropriate adjustments to the policy to achieve the desired effect.Targeted poverty alleviation requires not only "hard work" but also "harvest".Evaluating the effectiveness of targeted poverty alleviation is not only an important mechanism for testing "true poverty alleviation" and "helping the poor",but also an important direction for effectively alleviating relative poverty in the future.Therefore,the evaluation of the performance of targeted poverty alleviation has become the starting point of this study in order to provide important practical significance and theoretical value for alleviating relative poverty in China and even the world.This research is based on poverty and anti-poverty theory,system theory,poverty traps theory,participatory development theory and ability poverty theory,review systematically related research results at home and abroad,the paper has studied according to the internal logic road of building accurate performance evaluation theory,revealing the accurate performance influence mechanism for poverty alleviation,discussing the precise performance improvement path and putting forth the policy recommendations of precision performance improvement for poverty alleviation.Based on the field survey data of 577 poor households of Shanghzhou district and Zha Shui county of shaanxi province in Qinba mountains.Firstly,household's income,consumption and living infrastructure in the research area,and reveals the problems that need to be improved in the process of targeted poverty alleviation in the research area.Secondly,the paper analyzes the participation degree of farmers' decision-making in poverty alleviation and its influencing factors in order to explore the influencing mechanism of poor households' participation in poverty alleviation projects and the degree of participation in poverty alleviation projects,studies that how the number and types of poverty alleviation projects can effectively realize the poverty alleviation approaches of different types of poor households.Thirdly,the paper analyzes the impact of targeted poverty alleviation projects on the income growth of poor households on order to explores the mechanism of targeted poverty alleviation projects on the income growth of poor households,and reveals that how targeted poverty alleviation projects can effectively improve the income growth of poor households.Fourthly,the paper analyzes the satisfaction degree in order to explore the mechanism of satisfaction degree of poor farmers on targeted poverty alleviation policies,and reveals that how to effectively improve the satisfaction degree of poor farmers on targeted poverty alleviation policies.Fifthly,the paper builds the sustainable livelihoods theoretical framework of poor peasant households from the development ability,economic ability and social ability three dimensions of evaluation index system,analyzes the impact of precise poverty alleviation project on the ability of sustainable livelihoods of different types of poor residents,reveals that the different types of poverty alleviation project can promote the level of realizing the sustainable livelihood.Finally,the paper builds precision performance comprehensive evaluation index system for poverty alleviation by public expectations,family resources endowment,precision for poverty alleviation,value perception,and the performance,based on the index of reliability,the structure validity,optimum fitting model,of structural equation model and the path coefficient and the mediation effect,in order to reveals key factors for poverty alleviation influencing the precision performance.On the basis of summarizing the research conclusions of the preceding chapter.The conclusions are as follows:(1)The per capita income of poor households has been increasing year by year,the size of the poor has been decreasing year by year,and the number of people living out of poverty has been increasing year by year;the targeted poverty alleviation policy has been implemented effectively,and has been recognized by 83.71% of poor farmers.The infrastructure construction,especially drinking water facilities and road construction in poverty alleviation areas have achieved significant results.Households' social security and living standards have improved significantly.The actual dilemma affecting the improvement of the performance of precision poverty alleviation still exists.All non-agricultural labor income of poor households is their main income,and agricultural income is generally low,indicating that the level of development of the agricultural industry in poor areas needs to be improved.The educational level of poor household heads is low.The level of skills training still needs to be strengthened;the labor force in poverty-stricken areas is aging seriously,and cultivated land resources are low and of low quality.(2)The proportion of poor households participating in precision poverty alleviation projects is 85%,indicating that the vast majority of poor households have participated in precision poverty alleviation projects,but the average number of poor households participating in the project is 1.32,indicating that the number of poor households participating in precision poverty alleviation projects is relatively single.(3)From the perspective of the performance analysis of poverty alleviation of poor households,it can be seen that the participation of precision poverty alleviation projects has improved the income level of farmers to a certain extent.The participation of different poverty alleviation project models has different effects on the increase of farmers 'income.The financial poverty alleviation model has the most significant effect,and the industrial poverty alleviation model and infrastructure construction poverty alleviation model have the second most important role.In terms of the absolute value change of farmers' income under different poverty alleviation models The income level of farmers is the highest under the financial poverty alleviation model,and the income level of farmers is relatively low under the industrial poverty alleviation and infrastructure construction poverty alleviation models.(4)From the perspective of poor households 'performance analysis of targeted poverty alleviation,we can see that poor farmers are more satisfied with the implementation of targeted poverty alleviation policies and the results of poverty alleviation,indicating that targeted poverty alleviation has achieved a good reputation and policy effects.The education level of heads of households,the cadres of heads of party members,and the distance to the county seat can all significantly positively affect farmers 'satisfaction with the effectiveness of targeted poverty alleviation policies.The number of family laborers,whether the family can access the Internet,and the participation of commercial insurance significantly negatively affect farmers' precision poverty Policy effect satisfaction.(5)From the perspective of the sustainable livelihood of poor households,it can be seen that precise poverty alleviation has a significant effect on the improvement of sustainable livelihoods,economic and social capabilities of poor households,but does not significantly improve the development ability of poor households;different precisions The participation of poverty alleviation measures has different effects on the improvement of sustainable livelihoods of different types of poor households;the number of participating projects has different impacts on the various livelihood capabilities of different poor households;precision poverty alleviation must achieve long-term effects and ensure that the results of poverty alleviation remain stable to completely change The face of poverty needs to take the improvement of livelihoods as the basic starting point and end point,and build a differentiated regional poverty alleviation mechanism based on this.(6)Finally,the realization path of improving the performance of targeted poverty alleviation is proposed.According to the analysis of the precise poverty alleviation performance path from the five aspects of public expectations,family resource endowment,precision of poverty alleviation,value perception,and poverty alleviation performance,public expectations have both direct and indirect effects on poverty alleviation performance.The indirect effect is through value perception.Intermediate variables produce poverty alleviation performance.Value perception is the long-term,implicit value orientation and demands of the needs of poverty alleviation targets,and it has a guiding and promoting role in satisfying the current poverty alleviation effect.The impact of family endowment on value perception is small,while it directly affects the performance of poverty alleviation.The accuracy of poverty alleviation has a large impact on the direct path of poverty alleviation performance,which is 0.53,while the indirect value perception is small,which is 0.34.It can be seen that on the one hand,targeted poverty alleviation needs to further strengthen the effectiveness of policies and gradually strengthen farmers' value judgments on the targeted poverty alleviation work process;on the other hand,it is also necessary to coordinate the micro-poverty alleviation mechanism and macro policy planning to comprehensively and comprehensively improve the targeted poverty alleviation.