| The supervision system of contemporary China is an important grasp and great creation for the CPC to lead the people to effectively lock public power into the system cage.In more than 70 years of history,the supervision system of contemporary China started from the initial form of the “People’s Supervisory Committee System” and gradually developed into an important content and organic component of the socialist political system with Chinese characteristics.A thorough and systematic study of the changes of the supervision system of contemporary China can not only enrich and develop the theoretical system of socialist political system with Chinese characteristics and promote the construction of theoretical discourse on the CPC and state oversight systems with Chinese characteristics,but also promote the construction of the national supervision system,assist in the construction of disciplines related to discipline inspection and supervision,enhance the international discourse power of the research of the supervision system of contemporary China and strengthen the confidence of the people in the supervision system of contemporary China.Due to the lack of good research on the changes of the supervision system of contemporary China in existing literature,it is particularly necessary and important to further strengthen and deepen the research on this issue in the context of the new era and new journey.Guided by the research approach of “cognitive change → understanding change →outlook change”,this thesis explores the change process,causes,characteristics,and development path of the supervision system of contemporary China in sequence.In the long history of over 70 years of the People’s Republic of China,the change course of the supervision system can be specifically divided into eight historical stages:system generation,system adjustment,system decline,system return,system integration,system strengthening,system promotion and system deepening.In the course of more than70 years of change,the supervision system of contemporary China has presented a wonderful picture of the political system change with Chinese characteristics.The establishment of the supervision system in contemporary China was the inevitable result of the CPC and its regime attaching great importance to the issue of power supervision.Subsequently,the supervision system of contemporary China underwent various adjustments under the influence of the “Constitutional Project” launched in 1953,the heavy national construction tasks,and the relevant practices of the Soviet Union.The expansion of the “Anti-Rightist Movement” was a key milestone event that led to the decline of the supervision system of contemporary China.In addition,“some leading comrades of the Ministry of Supervision were branded as rightists” and “Mao’s opinions” respectively played an important and decisive role in the decline of the supervision system of contemporary China.After the reform and opening up,the convening of the Third Plenary Session of the 12 th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was a key milestone event that affected the process of the return of the supervision system of contemporary China.The revival of the concept of “rule of law” provided conceptual support for the return of the supervision system of contemporary China.The support and promotion of the Party Central Committee with Deng Xiaoping as the core was the core driving force for the return of the supervision system of contemporary China.Subsequently,in the integration of the supervision system and the party’s discipline inspection system,the operation dilemma of the separation of the discipline inspection and supervision system was the direct driver,the change of corruption governance concept of the CPC Central Committee played a decisive role,and the historical experience of disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies working together was also an important influencing factor.Later,the strengthening of the supervision system of contemporary China was mainly driven by three factors: the operational difficulties of the existing “dual-leadership” system,the changes in the international environment,and the concerted efforts of the Party Central Committee and local governments.Since entering the new era,the supervision system of contemporary China has realized the promotion from “administrative supervision system”to “national supervision system”,the direct motivation of this change is the institutional defects and practical difficulties of the existing anti-corruption system,the conceptual support is Xi’s new views,new judgments and new requirements on anti-corruption,and the key driving force is the great attention and scientific planning of the Central Committee of the CPC.Later,the deepening and improvement of the national supervision system is initiated under the support and guidance of Xi’s new views,new judgment and new requirements on anti-corruption.The other reasons for the deepening and improvement of the national supervision system come from two aspects: the objective situation that the system itself is not perfect,and the other is the active promotion of the CPC Central Committee.The changes of the supervision system of contemporary China over the past 70 years has shown significant characteristics in six aspects: from “administrative supervision” to“national supervision”,from “1.0 version of joint office” to “2.0 version of Joint office”,from “public participation” to “elite participation”,from “formal ‘rule of law’” to“substantive ‘rule of law’”,from “gradual change” to “radical change”,and from “learning from” to “innovation leading”.Promoting the deepening development of the supervision system is of great significance to China’s anti-corruption and integrity work in the new era.Based on historical experience and the requirements of the times,it is necessary to promote the development and improvement of the supervision system of contemporary China from four aspects: firstly,to strengthen the leadership of the CPC over supervision system;secondly,to rely on the supervision system to achieve people’s ownership;thirdly,to continuously improve the level of legalization of the supervision system;fourthly,to enhance the collaborative operation level of the supervision system. |