On The "Inter-Lingual Nature" Of The Current Chinese Literature Criticism Discourse

The current Chinese literary criticism discourse has a distinct and easily overlooked fundamental characteristic--"inter-lingual nature". The so-called "inter-lingual nature" means the literary criticism discourse in a "complex speaking context" or "inter-lingual"model-------by which the time axis (traditional/modern) shared the space axis(Chinese/Western or Eastern/Western) are cross-cutting interaction, and formed three-dimensional space or network, as a "kink" or "exist" of the intersection in the face of Chinese own literary phenomenon, and by a variety of complex factors "multiple efforts" to influence, and even the statute of the decision to show the patterns, or chemical properties. Therefore, when we explore the current literary criticism discourse "inter-lingual nature", have to be from the "inter-lingual" model or space. So the paper is the mainstay on two axis to the current Chinese literature criticism discourse "inter-lingual nature" a concrete exploration and exposition.During the frame, the literary criticism discourse always in the traditional/modern tension. The paper through traditional/modern sides of the complex relationship betweenthe internal and intermedial------the impact of modernity, traditional classical literarycriticism discourse "fracture", because of the complexity of "traditional" ,what leads to criticism from outside modernity discourse producing different patterns to clarify that the current literary criticism discourse "inter-lingual nature" is inevitable. As a latecomer modernity, Chinese literary criticism discourse to be made before the modern model of state influence and limitations, we can not escape those patterns, but in which exploration and development. In this sense, not only China, almost all the aftermath of the country's modern literary criticism discourse is "inter-lingual nature" identity. There is a national traditional/modern "love-hate cutting", because of this, all the countries of the world or national literary criticism discourse have the fundamental characteristic-"inter-lingual nature".In the space axis, the paper through the Chinese/Western collisions between reflection and conflict, to clarify the complicated relationship is not only in determiningthe Chinese mainland literary criticism discourse basic outlook, but also the discourse of our existing resources, ways of discourse and ways of thinking from the west great affection. "Inter-lingual nature" in this context is formed. Then adopted for the "aphasia" of the discourse analysis, the so-called purely "local nature" literary criticism discourse does not exist. Western literary criticism discourse after "China" has been integrated into the current criticism and also our own flesh and blood. And further pointed out that within Western literary criticism discourse also exist various differences and diversity as well as our similar situations, in the sense, Western literary criticism discourse is "inter-lingual" criticism discourse. So the entire world literature criticism discourses are all "inter-lingual" discourse to criticize the conclusions.We are in a multiple speaking context of the cultural transition period. This period "inter-lingual nature" towards deeper and broader development, including China, the world order that discourse is moving toward "inter-lingual nature".