Font Size: a A A

The Study On "Evil Book" And "Fallacy" During The Ming Dynasty

Posted on:2009-05-17Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X J TanFull Text:PDF
GTID:2155360272980719Subject:History of Ancient China
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
"Evil book"and"fallacy"were considered as a familiar speech marker, and were abhorred by dominators all through the ages. The code set up relevant accusations directed at fabricating and transmitting"evil book"and"fallacy"during successive dynasties, and to avoiding this situation dominators implemented killing measures. The cases of"evil book"and"fallacy"were respectable during Ming Dynasty. Through these cases, the"evil book"and"fallacy"during the Ming Dynasty were classified and carded into four categories, namely treason category, literacy inquisition, political struggle document category. The rest were classified among another category, which can not be fallen under hereinbefore"evil book"and"fallacy". In the types, the treason category of"evil book"and"fallacy"was at predominant position during the whole Ming Dynasty, and variation of proportion of different types reflect developmental characteristics during different periods of the Ming Dynasty.There were multiple reasons that causing"evil book"and"fallacy": First, the"evil book"and"fallacy"spreading during successive dynasties were important origin; then, the bottom hoi polloi fabricated by themselves, for they was bewitched or made a living; further more, the bureaucracy need to use"evil book"and"fallacy"for political struggle; finally, the addition of hobo enrich the fabricating and spreading procession for"evil book"and"fallacy". The bewitchment and fluidity of"evil book"and"fallacy"made them influence court, society and hoi polloi profoundly, and they not only became root of various turbulences and increased unsteady society element frequently, they also led to numbers of injustice cases, at the same time, they make dual infections which are incompatible to hoi polloi's thought.Through the analysis of the Ming Dynasty, it is obvious that: the so-called"evil book"and"fallacy"during successive dynasties were directed at dominators, and their standards were in terms of dominators which defined as whether harm dominators'dominion. However, dominators did not turn over to think the defects and errors of their ideological education, but they took killing, a simple and violent method, to strike. However, this method can not meet the ideaistic request of hoi polloi, which is the essential reason that"evil book"and"fallacy"can not be forbidden even though dominators prohibited repeatedly.
Keywords/Search Tags:the Ming Dynasty, evil book, fallacy, right of speech
PDF Full Text Request
Related items