| The technical reconstruction project was applied for register in CHANGCHUN GEAR WORKS in 1998,and it was approved by FAW. The total transmission output was 41313 units from 1999 to 2003.Review and analysis of the project feasibilitythe method and conclusion of feasibility of CAS5-25Q7 technical reconstruction project was analyzed and reviewed. The main analysis and review was the demand and forecast of the market, the feasibility of product developing and technology, the feasibility of produce, investment budget and collection, all kinds of produce cost, indication of evaluating finance. Among them, the important indication of inter income rate, investment profit rate, investment profit and tax rate, investment retrieve term etc., was principle analyzed. The article contrasts those indications to the standard of car part industry's technical reconstruction, then gives the assessment of conclusion of the feasibility: it has a prospect future for CAS5-25Q7 to develop, it must bring good profit for enterprise.Analysis the situation of the project's actual transformation and production run1.the article clarified the actual situation of the produce and technology after the transformation. It clarified four aspects respectively, i.e., factory address and produce structure, actual purchase and co-ordinate, actual manufacture technology, situation of product, and analyzed the cause of difference between the actual situation of produce technology and feasibility by contrasting.2.the article did an economy analysis to the produce and management of the 5-25Q7 technical reconstruction project. It contrasted the investment of the plan to the actual run, the saving is 7630000 Yuan . The main cause was that fixed asset was declined. The deviation was bigger between real output and feasibility forecast output, and the economy profit was loss, since the project was run for 5 years from 1999 to 2003. From the view of calculating term of the project, the article used the statistics method to forecast the output, which will be produced from2004 to 2010, and analyzed the ability of produce, and forecasted the market to the future, therefore, it decided each year's output during the calculating term. It was the basis data for the project to forecast real cost and real funds flowing, and conclude the main finance indication of the real run project. The project can run in reality and has a splendid future, because the indication is superior to the industrial assessment indication.3. From the evidence of comparing the feasibility with real run, it drew a conclusion of post assessment. One, The conclusion of real run for 5 years of the project: saving investment, product and produce technology attend the demand of feasibility, however, the amount of producing and selling, and price did not attend the demand of feasibility, moreover, economy profit was loss. The other, the post assessment conclusion of the whole project: â‘ To the feasibility assessment: The design of product's development and manufacture technology is right. Moreover, the feasibility was more optimistic, it was not accurate for the forecast output, and the deviation was bigger. â‘¡ To the project assessment: the economy effect, output, selling volume did not attend the indication of feasibility's demand in the project's real run, and it had a big distance, but the indication in project's real run was superior to the car industrial indication, that is to say, the project can run in reality and have a splendid future. â‘¢In a word, it has a distance between the feasibility and actual run in the CAS5-25Q7 technical reconstruction. However, the project effect of actual run was superior to the industrial standard of assessment, it can run in reality and have a prospect future. Therefore, in a summary, the technical reconstruction project was successful.The main exiting problem of the project actual run and further management method and proposal1.Take main existing problem in the process of the project actual run as followed: â‘ The subsidiary factory h...
|
PDF Full Text Request