Subjectivity International Relationship Criticism

The end of the Cold War is a world event, which shaped a watershed to research objects and paradigm in politics, history, philosophy domain. The point of the view is also accepted worldwidely. From the era gap of the view, undoubtedly, the study objects and paradigm of International Relationship is at the turning point, too. Subjectivity and post-subjectivity International Relationship are basic concepts set up in my paper. Post-modernity International Relationship in global era is the study object of the concepts. The reason for setting up the concepts from the angle of subjectivity history is to differentiate them from modernity and post-modernity International Relationship. The category of modernity and early post-modernity International Relationship is dated, because there is vestige of authoritarianism in these theories. Now the timeworn authoritarianism theories can't provide a valid explain to interdependence complexion in the coming international relationship realm. The paper presupposes that modernity and post-modernity International Relationship theories are based on state-centered authoritarianism, so we view them as traditional International Relationship. In global era, we view the study of interdependence International Relationship from subjectivity history as subjectivity and post-subjectivity International Relationship. There are differences in three aspects between these two analytical views. Firstly, the traits of traditional modernity and early post-modernity International Relationship are: state-centered world system, power-interest oriented, industry society background. Secondly, the traits of post-subjectivity International Relationship are: subjectivity-centered world system, inter-subjectivity-interdependence oriented, knowledge society background.