The Legal System Of Social House

After 30 years of reform and opening up, China has basically established a market-oriented housing system. But the market-oriented housing system in the provision of quality housing products, while also making a considerable number of people, especially the housing problems of low-income groups more difficult. Can be seen in-depth housing market has not brought home the social equity, and thus the legitimacy of the housing market itself has also been questioned non-stop. China's housing reform is in fact in order to meet the housing needs of the majority of people start, the cause of the current burden of housing the people complaining the result of the policy not the original intention of the original assignee. So we very much need to re-look at since the reform and opening up of China's housing reform since the development process of China's housing system to identify the crux of the reform. Second, developed countries and regions abroad, especially in Taiwan, Germany and the United States, after years of exploration have also developed a practice has its own characteristics, housing security system, and basically met to reconcile the housing market and housing, the conflict between fairness. So their experience is worth our study and learning. Developed by combing the above-mentioned protective housing development process, allows us to recognize that in any country, its housing system is to take into account social equity and market efficiency, and the need by state intervention to solve the housing market brought about by The problem of excessively high burden on public housing, which has its own Social House, legal system, establish necessary. By comparing the outside legal system of Social House and review the course of China's housing reform that our present system of Social House has been completely unable to meet under the conditions arising from the public housing equity. This is mainly due to China's excessive reliance on direct state intervention means of the concept of direct funding to the neglect of the results of an indirect means of financing. Is therefore necessary to adopt a reduction in Direct Investments and Indirect Investments to the expansion of two aspects of the existing legal system of Social House in-depth reform. And market-oriented housing system requires the Government to a higher than the planned economy era, and the wisdom of ultra-management tools, not the kind of stick to the planned economy era of an administrative order as the main mode of control means. In addition, building a socialist country ruled by law has become China's party and the government's governing ideas, his country should be reflected among the various systems, protective housing, the legal system is naturally no exception. Protective housing, the legal system should be mainly implement the rule of law in democratic principles, a principle of administration according to law and legal certainty principle that the first shelter to protect the legal system should be sufficient guarantee of the people through the People's Congress or other means to guarantee the effective participation of housing policy the development process, by focusing on the strength of the whole society sought to protect the legal system of housing policies and regulations of the rationality and legitimacy; followed by the executive authorities in the implementation of safeguards should abide by the law legal system, the housing authority and the law, not ultra vires is also should not fail to act effectively to protect the nature of the legal system and implementing shelter in place; the final guarantee of the legal system of housing policies and regulations can not by itself unclear, beyond the cognitive ability of ordinary people to make use of a uniform legal terminology in order to ensure a unified and rational norms to explain , making the legal system to protect the true nature of the housing can be a benign operation.