Interpretation To The View Of Liang Qichao'Public And Private

Since ancient times, " public " and " private " among social life of Chinais a pair of basic social relationships categories, it is a pair of basic socialethics concepts too. The merger of the social relationships of its relation andstructure, is concerning the country, monarch, society, the value orientation ofthe relation and code of conduct between individual, concerning importantissues, such as the normal and social morals of the social ideology and coreof the value system, etc.. Study the changes took place under thecircumstances that the civilization with the west public and private crosses ofthe tradition public and private of China since modern times, contribute toknow the idea and norm public and private of China, give help to buildsociety and personal development rational order offer reference public andprivate. At present, already involving several propositions that developmentdeveloping, value judgement, midwest of the idea compare, etc. public andprivate about research of domestic academia, but generally speaking alsoquite weak, very systematic, as to modern view excavates and specializes infar from being enough even public and private. While the modern China'sknowledge system makes the transition, it is on Liang Qichao that there areno the second person's function, influence. Nearly at every specific field, lastthe atmosphere one Liang Qichao first. This text regards Liang Qichao's ideapublic and private as the research object. This text is divided into three parts. First part has investigated culture background of Liang Qichao's publicand private mainly. First of all, the author investigated the view public andprivate of China., including shape of words, semantic meaning and thetraditional idea of public and private in China. The culture public and privateof tradition of China is taking as the leading factor with " Esteemming publicand repressing private ", though in the long historical long river, there was a espeech that pleaded for private once, but failed to break through the "common restriction " and approved " private " all the time. Secondly, hasinvestigated the western view of public and private. Western " common "including " private factor ", the west regards clear personal private interestsas the standard, and the so-called common profit is generally that the societybetween each private interests combines the way. The society combine way 48whether that kind plant " spirit of the agreement " of the western traditiondeeply, just through the agreement way, people exactly mix personal andone's own private interests together, thus become " common profit ", andform of usage fruit of " common profit " of agreement is it is it ensure to getoff to stipulate this kind later. This has been produced too taking defendingthe individual rights and free " private " as purpose and " commonly". Finally,investigated the exchange of the view public and private of modern Chinaand foreign countries. Modern in the west taking ensuring individual rights,freedom as basic goal the view is spread into public and private, westernmissionary's criticism " too private to have and common " to China, culture isreviewed public and private to impel intellectuals to this country. They regardthe west as and appraise the Chinese reference system, lack " social morality" after discovering Chinese. Just under the background this era, Liang Qichaolaunched thinking deeply to the question public and private. Second part has described Liang Qichao's view of public and private.First of all, it has described the criticism of Liang Qichao to the view publicand private of China's tradition. He thinks, common morality is lack andprivate morality is complete, display while being concrete and sum up therelation between various kinds of morals as the personal relations, regardadjusting kinsfolks' relation as morals core of construction, put emphasis onintrospection of cultivating o...