The Research On Urban Community Residents Autonomy Of Our Country

The 11th session of the Seventh NPC adopted the "Organic Law of urbanresidents committees of the People's Republic" at december 1989. article 2 of TheOrganic Law provides resident committees a mass organization of theself-management, self-education, the relations between government, street office andresidents committee is guiding to being guided, but in actuality, which has become arelation of leading to being led, residents committees became an administrativeorganizations. With the acceleration of the transformation of our society, most of thesocial functions away from enterprise and the service function away from governmenthave to be taken over by urban communities, the importance of the community arebecoming more and more prominent, the original administrative management modelof the residents committee has been unable to meet the development of social.November 2000, the CPC Central Committee General Office and State CouncilGeneral Office issued the "the opinions on the promotion of urban communitybuilding of Ministry of Civil Affairs". Residents committees began to change intocommunity residents committees, community residents autonomy have also beenestablished as a principle. The papers Introduced history and current status ofcommunity autonomy depend on the history of The ChaoYang District residentscommittees, and discussed community residents autonomy construction achievementsand shortcomings on the basis of legal provisions of the party's relevant policies andour Constitution and the Organic Law of urban residents committee.China has set up a framework for community residents autonomy. Partyleadership is the core of our community residents autonomy;Community residentsCommittee building is the key of autonomy construction;the focus of residentsautonomy is services for residents.There are still a lot defections in building our communities, First, the relationshipbetween the government and community are not straighten out, the functions ofautonomy were hampered. Secondly, the community leadership of the partyorganization has not been completely reversed from the traditional pattern, not fitingthe development of current residents community autonomy, must innovate the party'sleadership style. Finally, community residents and the community unit are lack of asense of belonging, the participant degree of community self-building is low.In concrete measures, the papers discussed that from three aspects. On thecommunities, perfecting primarily the autonomous organizations and specificoperational mechanism. On the government, transforming government functions,returning the management right of public affairs to communities and enhancingresidents participant degree. On the party, it is necessary to change the party'sleadership style, and give full play to the party's core leadership, and build a bridgebetween the government and the community to help residents with autonomy legally.