Font Size: a A A

On The Perfection Of Administrative Accountability Legislation In China

Posted on:2015-07-13Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2176330431969637Subject:Constitution and Administrative Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
China is in an important period of transition society never had, is also engaged in efforts to build the rule of law the government, under such a magnificent backdrop, which began in2003SARS accountability storm swept across the country, and state reached its peak in2008, the administrative accountability has also made some progress, but because of the relatively late start of the administrative accountability system, and our own administrative system there are also some problems, so the development of the administrative accountability The process also produces a lot of problems and shortcomings, and that has not formed a unified administrative accountability law, at this stage to build a unified legal regulations become imperative. In this paper, starting from the perspective of the law, and relying on the existing "Interim Measures for administrative accountability", focuses on the development of administrative measures to improve the accountability law.The article is divided into four parts, the first part introduces the basic theory of the introduction of administrative accountability, expounded on the basic concept of administrative accountability, characteristics and according to the legal basis of the Constitution and other theoretical issues, and explores the administrative accountability necessity. The second part of the status quo of administrative accountability for a detailed description of the administrative accountability has gone through three major periods, which are incidental period, storm-style accountability period, rational administrative accountability of the new era of accountability. The third part introduces the administrative accountability legislation of defects, mainly in: the lack of a unified law, the lack of legal authority of low rank, low rank principle shall not comprehensive, accountable body is not comprehensive enough, the scope of accountability too narrow, accountability procedures are not standardized. The last part is to solve these problems, made a number of recommendations to improve the hope that through this article related to exploration, attempts to improve the administrative accountability of the legislative proposals to change the law in the past without the embarrassment of accountability, to achieve a certain degree of administrative accountability Government in building the rule of law and responsible government in value and function.
Keywords/Search Tags:administrative accountability, rule of law and government, legislativedefects, Legislation
PDF Full Text Request
Related items