The Logic Of Changes About The Collective Forest Right

This is a thesis which applies political sociology to explain collective right of forests transformation. It chooses Xi village in central Fujian as the research unit and collective right of forests as the carrier and the breakthrough point, utilizes country - social analysis paradigm, integrates discipline knowledge such as politics, sociology and economic to research. It wants to answer the core question whether China's collective right of forests institution's change is one kind of historical logic break and the replacement or it follows some logic all the way. It's purpose is to develop the Chinese village research's domain, theory and method.On the basis of holding related materials and utilizing comparative research and historic research, it observes and thinks about the practice and mechanism of collective forest's right reform after reform and opening-up of Xi town in central Fujian province in the view of China's modernization process and farmer's own department and follows the route of state intervence, society transformation, market growth, farmer action and collective forest's right reform. In which, the restrictions and transforming logic is it's primary study and it's basic research dimensionality is state effect, farmer action and rural development. Through this research, it offers an uniqe and strict case for China's rural land reform process in the later half of 21 Century and expresses author's thinking.On Xi village's experience, regardless of forestry's "Three Fixes " reform, forestry stock cooperation system reform and the collective ownership of forests market operation, all can be called the rechange of third land reform and each reform is the strategical response to the present economic and social background. Generally speaking, the collective right of forests change course is not only fanner's forest land right return and it's growth, but also the process of administrative strength--initiative or passive - which releases authority, and shows that state's dominant position is fading out gradually from forestry development.If looking from the whole rural reform advancement and the national conformity to rural society, the farming and forestry's imblanced development is resulted from balanced development idea and the system establishment to some extent, for which, same or similar institutional arrangements have not brought the same progress because of different restricted factors. Therefore, the collective right of forests institution reform follows the balanced development institutional arrangement logic.Research discovered that in China, land institution including the forest land's is not only the economic institution, also involves the legal institution and the political institution and even involves to the country's understanding. In fact, the property right is a political issue. As an important policy and the practice for rural area, the collective right of forests institution reform is the direct implementation and the vivid development of the national will and ability in rural area. Land policy's adjustment may balance national construction and farmer's relation.In the theory of interaction between modern country and rural society, the national intervence in collective right of forests institution reform primaryly consides is not the farmer rights and interests or other but the national strategy needs. Because of this, the country macroscopic development targets and ideology change has not very only huge influence to the collective right of forests reform, but also relates the farmer rights and interests and the village development condition. That is to say, social bodies's policy expectation not only relates the previous but the futhure. They influence the real practical effect of public policy.Although the owner of forest whose passive existence is merely not decided by institutional arrangements and the social structure, they may consoder, choice and move in the system and the structure assign in the frame and influence and change the system and the structure's characteristic and the character. However, in contrast with nation's dominat position in policy's supplying, their resistance is very limited. Even if one social body needed-oriented insistution arrangment may not make prosperctive effect. An important factor for this problem is that participant's practice experience and reacll may play restricted role. That is, the social main body's policy anticipated will not only aim at the future, but also possibly aimed the past; The two joint influences community policy practice result.As a matter of fact, China's reform and opening-up is the process of institution transformation and construction. Although the institution intervence may not advance rural development, the most attractive way to promote rural develpoment is the input of logos of redevolution power to people. To the extent that, it is better to say that China's rural development is decided by politic condition and better governence rather than the institution reform.