The Pratice Logic Of Reform About The Collective Forest Right

Collective forest land is an important part of cultivated land in China, which is of great significance to realize sustainable development of the collective forest resources for national economic development, social progress and ecological construction. The reform of collective forest property rights system can stabilize and improve the rural basic management systems and increase income of peasant, it is a major changes of the rural relations of production, which will take great inpact in the overall situation and far-reaching. In this paper, a village in central of Jiangxi Province as an example of case studies, Including two examples,one is the contract of woodland of village collective, the other is Sub-mountain to home of collective forest land which have been divided to the second group, through the collective property rights and collective forest tenure reform existing in the rural community from the sociological perspective, Integrated social structure determinism and rational choice theory perspective, studying the practice of Chinese rural collective forest property rights reform and try to have a logical explanation of the collective forest rights Reform. Pointed out that the Sociological of collective property rights, especially the reform, are not as all it seems as of the economic scholars who think it is clear and divided by the formation of a relatively stable relationship of the structure, on the contrary, it is the process of interaction and game between the social behavior of persons and their social environment continue. In the process, many factors play a role in succession, including the institutional context, institutional arrangements and non-institutional factors, institutional context is exogenous variables, comprised by a series of actions to determine the process of reform, the basic premise of the political, economic, social and legal systems, including market rules, laws, regulations and government departments. Institutional arrangements and non-institutional factors are two different aspects of the rules in the village, the former is a formal system of villages, mainly on the village level, the later is comprised by a series of regulations and organizational structure, which is informal, but plays an important the role of norms, epitomized by the village culture such as human and fair. This conclusion has the following four points:First, the collective ownership of rural life is a complicated concept in practice, expressed mainly from three points, the relationship from the collective and the state, the clear exclusion of collective property rights and the complex argument on collective property rights in the collective group members belonging to these; Second, the reform of collective forest rights is a very complex and dynamic process, system and non-system, In other words, rational interaction between the structure and practice in the whole process, making the whole process always in flux. In these three factors, non-institutional factors in the collective forest reform in the practice of action privide the villagers the most important basis; Third, today the concept of social relations that favor a strong theoretical weapon for rural life, the relations logic is an important influential logic in the reform of collective forest rights. Seeing throughout the reform process, the villagers are still following the principles of sensibilities. Fourth, the bias and imbalance of value of rational obvious constraints and disturb the collective forest reform,value of rationality is still guide of rural community action, this is inseparable from the bias and imbalance of value of rational, caused by the proposed collective forest rights reform, the traditional villages to include in the comprehensive consideration of the same value to establish a correct conception of reason. Thus, proposed in the reform of collective forest right, traditional villages should be included in the comprehensive considerations in the same time establish a correct concept of value rationality.