"accountability And Government Leading Cadres" Comeback Study

China's cadres gradually formalized accountability in the new century. With the advance of rule of law, accountability, improved gradually, from "storming" to normalization, by the "power of accountability" to "accountability system", by the party and government discipline increased accountability for the criminal accountability. Cadres to be accountable back issues worth discussing. I defined the meaning of return are:the accountability process, active or passive positions assume responsibility for loss of party and government leaders, in a certain period of time for specific reasons and fixed procedures are superior or similar organizations and their personnel department promotion, transferred, demoted to other posts, re-leading positions. Back is the nature of party and government leaders are accountable re-selection and appointment of its constituent elements include:the main body back, back form and return conditions (time, reason, procedures), etc.. Be a result of major accidents leading cadres of party and government accountability back, is a media and public attention. Reality shows that the central and local accountability of cadres were back there are differences, the performance of different time intervals for the return, the characteristics of different back office level. Academia and the media accountable for whether or not the return of cadres, there are two opposing views, I believe, should take a rational view to be the fault of the accountability of cadres, the cadres to be accountability, "rehabilitation" of opportunity, not total negation to avoid the waste of human resources cadres to ensure accountability and effective operation of related systems, reflecting the country's political rationality of our party.Accountability of party and government leading cadres is the reason why lead the community back in question, because the reason people come back, conditions and procedures is not clear. Objectively speaking, some cadres are accountable back rather not standardized, there are more problems, summed up, is not justified by the accountability of cadres back, back conditions are not met, back in the process transparent. Accountability of cadres by the negative impact of non-standard back immeasurable, undermining the seriousness of the accountability system, reducing the credibility of the party and the government violated the democratic rights of the public, contrary to the democratic rule of law.Party and government leaders to be accountable back non-standard, at the outset that the existing accountability system design flaws. Accountability refers to the specific subject of accountability of public accountability for those responsibilities and obligations and the implementation of the circumstances demand it to bear negative results the norm. Principal by the principal accountability, accountable, accountability, scope, accountability standards, accountability procedures, accountability constitute the basic elements of the consequences of the current deficiencies in the accountability system on its constituent elements are reflected. Party and government leaders to be accountable back is not standardized, but also that the current accountability system matched with the other systems are also problems, specifically, is the cadre appointment system and supervision system have to be improved. Party and government leaders to be accountable back non-standard, in addition to the reasons for the political system, there existed "official standard" impact of socio-cultural reasons.For the specification of cadres back, the author has his own thinking, first of all cadres back to clear the principle that compliance with the time interval, open and transparent procedure and the principles of discrimination. Followed by efforts from the system and the culture of accountability to improve, deepen reform and the appointment and supervision system through the construction of the socialist core value system get rid of "Official Standard" cultural influence. Finally, and most important, is to establish scientific and reasonable return mechanism cadres, the cadres back more institutionalized, standardized, with regularity, feasibility, consistency and systematic. Specifically, is from the training and assessment, trial and evaluation, before their appointment, and democratic supervision to be sure all links.