A Comparative Study Of Taiwanese Kangxuan Edition And Continental Chinese Textbooks For Primary School

China Taiwan and Mainland China both belong to Chinese cultural and share the same culture at all times, but they have different humanistic flatus, the inheritance of the native language cultural is no exception either, that caused by historical reasons. And breakthrough and innovation, commonness and individuality in the two different textbook can bring us reference of Chinese textbook’s compilation, thus which may promote the development of of Chinese textbook’s compilation. This paper soaked Kang Hsuan Press and Jiangsu Educational Press as the research object, using the research methods such as comparison and literature research to compare the two Chinese textbook’s compilation. Combed the revelation of the Chinese textbook’s compilation based on the comparison which is the of innovation of the paper.The basic concept of curriculum is guidelines of the textbooks written comments are to indicate the direction to Chinese textbooks’compilation, while the ideology of textbook’s compilation embodied the basic concept of curriculum and textbooks written comments. The basic concept of curriculum in the two sides both pay attention to training students’ Chinese basic ability, but Taiwan focus on students’learning ability while Mainland China emphasize their continent Lifelong Learning; Textbooks written comments on both sides are exquisite normative, but Taiwan is more specific and more meticulous than the mainland; Textbooks written ideology differences:Kang Hsuan focus on the ability that by learning can get along with students; while Jiangsu is a departure from the three-dimensional object, which is committed to cultivate the students’ Chinese accomplishment in an all-round way.Here are the two editions of Chinese textbook in the presentation of the similarities and differences. Structure of textbooks:they both use unit comprehensive arrangement, but Kang Hsuan is of holistic while Jiangsu sees more flexible. Structure of unit:they both overall speaking and writing four aspects when the reading text as the core of unit, but Kang Hsuan have clear theme of the unit while Jiangsu are not, and the number of the units is less than Jiangsu. Publishing properties:The psychological characteristics of children are both taken into account, but Kang Hsuan highlights humanistic characteristics while Jiangsu are of plain.The comparison in four system of the two editions of the textbooks in detail are as follows. Example system:The genres in the two editions of the textbooks are both rich and diverse, but Kang Hsuan have higher proportion of practical while Jiangsu have innovation in genre. Knowledge system:Presentation of knowledge system in the two editions of the textbooks are both comprehensive choreographed, but Kang Hsuan is more holistic than Jiangsu. Content of knowledge system in the two editions of the textbooks are both incorporated into the speaking and writing knowledge,but Kang Hsuan pay more attention to the method of speaking and writing than Jiangsu. Practice system:they both consolidate the knowledge and achieve a migration of the ability, but Kang Hsuan pay more attention to listening training while Jiangsu emphasize integrated learning activities of Chinese. Reading-aided system:Kang Hsuan pay more attention to students reading experience while Jiangsu is a bit of serious.The enlightenment of the two editions of the textbooks. The ideology of textbook should take student-centered in account and bring up good study habits in learning Chinese. Structure of unit must combine longitudinal connection and horizontal linkages. Publishing properties should take psychological characteristics of children into account and highlights humanistic characteristics. Example system should be close to students’ life, and should consider the pace of times and classical in both,should be moderate amount. Appropriately increase the knowledge of reading and writing method hear; emphasis on listening training, writing training to cultivate interest; emphasis on the educational value of reading aid system, give full play to the role of reading-aided system.