Government-led Non-material Cultural Heritage Protection

"Intangible cultural heritage" of conservation and heritage is still a relatively new concept, but in fact, most countries including China, have been conducting non-material cultural heritage of the work. Worldwide, non-material cultural heritage are the government and its administrative sector, and, the biggest advantage of this protection mode is that it can solve the private and corporate inability to complete large projects. Especially for the endangered cultural heritage, because the changes in the environment, culture, the soil is gone there is also a lack of economic benefits into the ability of administrative agencies to resolve cultural projects taking the most basicsurvival. This paper focuses on the drama of Guangdong Shanwei Lufeng orthography, once prospered in the eastern part of western Fujian, the Republic gradually declined, to the founding of new China, a professional body has not survived until the 1980s, through government support, was reborn. Throughout the CNS development and regeneration process of the play, it is easy to conclude that government-led public affairs have a huge advantage. However, the government agency set up its own system defects, but also easy to bring bureaucratic inefficiency - the current Chinese government at all levels in the operation of non-heritage items, when shown the shortcomings of the very obvious benefits or reduce, chasing short-term benefits, the blind pursuit of cultural industries technology and culture into a performance engineering. Deeper issue, but also administrative agencies are more able to solve the problem, because almost all the power agencies have the resources, development will inevitably lead to predatory and destructive construction, in some places even the government pre-empt the Executive instead of direct intervention in cultural expert heritage identification, protection. Want to play this kind of spread through the seal of approval history and status of the order, the protection of this stage, the overall perspective, cultural projects and the relevant international experience and lessons learned analysis, looking for administration work in the non-heritage protection advantages and disadvantages of , the final conclusion: non-heritage protection must be government-led force, while the theory must be in accordance with public administration, introduction of a corporate management model to manage a single non-heritage project to determine the genetic order of non-responsibility system, in accordance with a clear non-government cultural heritage protection law department's responsibilities and obligations, mobilize all social forces to participate, to develop 'cultural awareness, to find a way consistent with the current political and economic background, can effectively and properly protect the cultural heritage protection and non-genetic inheritance of the road.