The Performance Measurement FOR County Government Based On DEA Model

Since the 1980s, Western developed countries into the financial crisis to escape,crisis management and Public crisis of confidence, thereby improving managementefficiency and governance, improving the relationship between the government andsociety to enhance the competitiveness of the government, have set off a wave ofmovement reform,explore the introduction of performance appraisal as amanagement tool and has been continually developed and refined. Since the1990s ourcountry suffered from economic globalization and information technology revolution,the impact of the government in the West to carry out a vigorous boom,driven byperformance evaluation of performance evaluation carried out to explore and try newthings, to strengthen the theory study. From the background point of view, the conceptof government performance evaluation system has been very well, has been formed inWestern countries operating system, but to make the performance evaluation with thetypical "Chinese characteristics", or a new field. Will be from the West used in thepublic sector performance evaluation system of local government in China is not aneasy performance evaluation, especially to the county level of government-depthevaluation. Our county government is the primary power system in a politicalorganization, which bears the entire county to promote economic growth andemployment, construction and maintenance of infrastructure, maintenance of publicorder, the implementation of compulsory education, environmental protection andother functions, provides the nation 70% of the population, public services, urban andrural economic and social development is the basic unit. Performance Evaluation ofCounty Government research has important theoretical and practical significance.The Government Performance Evaluation from home and abroad on researchresults and practical experience to start, government performance in the content andfunctions of county government on the basis of clearly defined, in theory the selectionof our county government performance evaluation system, and the use of The indexsystem, with data envelopment (DEA) method of Yongdeng other 11 counties (cities)of the actual government performance evaluation and comparative analysis. Throughanalysis, we draw the following conclusions: First, the performance includes a number of aspects, namely, the performance of public utilities, the performance ofliving, economic development performance, performance and environmentalperformance of urbanization, only take into account all aspects, in order to improvethe government consolidated performance; second, the top ten counties are therebetween the imbalance can be seen all over the county government there areshortcomings; third, Yongdeng county and the county as the top ten counties in Gansulevel of performance exists between the larger gap. On this basis, put forward specificsuggestions in order to initiate the county level, offering advice and suggestions toenhance government performance.