"Economic Man" From The Perspective Of Government Dishonesty Behavior

According to the Marxist point of view, government is a public authority entrusted with the authority or enforcement agencies, government is the essence of public power entrusted to the government represents a public trust. China is the sole legal government of the Modern Government, its legitimacy is in its first win the trust of honest government. However, in economies transition, the impact of a variety of reasons, the ongoing lack of government integrity, a long lasting illnesses, has seriously hindered the development of market economy, affecting the image of the government, reducing government credibility. Market economy is the credit economy, requires the government to strictly abide by the principle of good faith. Meanwhile, the government credibility in the social credit system plays an important role in the foundation is the cornerstone of the social credit system. Therefore, the Government is particularly important research integrity.In view of this, the "economic man" assumption basic theory, credibility theory and behavior from the starting assumptions, first defined the concept of good faith with the government, the use of empirical analysis and comparative analysis of the mechanism of government integrity, the integrity of our government appearance and integrity of the social effects caused by deficiency in the conduct of government officials and government organizations such assuming the hypothesis, based on analysis of the general lack of governmental credit cause and integrity of our government's lack of specific reasons, such as government public officials " cost-benefit "trade-off, government failure and the transition-specific factors. Then, the practice of building the United States and the integrity of government dishonesty of Shanghai prevention practices and examples of the basic case, summed up the integrity of the building of our government rewarding experience and inspiration. Finally, on this basis, the government lack credibility given the path to prevention:the role of correct positioning of administrative staff, reshape the role of government, improve service philosophy, and moral change and improve the incentive and restrictive regulations, institutional innovation, and so on.