The Discussions Of The Annotation With Writing In Classical Chinese From Chinese Teaching Books For Junior High School

In Chinese Teaching Books for junior high school, there are many discussions of the annotation, especially in the lesson of writings in classical Chinese .The discussion usually show in three aspects: First , the change of annotation between new teaching materials and old teaching materials .Second ,the article of discussion from Secondary Teacher to call in question .Third , the article of discussion from Professional Studies .In this research ,I collect achievements of these discussions as much as possible ,and differentiate and analyze with theirs true or false , especially aim at the annotation which get a cacophony of expert opinions ,or which intensive study not as yet .In this research, it consists of concentrating all the annotations and making observation. List the different annotation opinions from every researcher in the first place, and then bring personal opinion in the way of making observation. Regard the Chinese Teaching Books as the a text against which other texts are checked, look up the document which is mentioned in the annotation that explain the provenience of original text; look up the different versions of the document; look up all of the annotations from scholars ancient and modern ,and the academic thesis that have been published today. The research makes every effort to concentrate all of the different opinions with the provenience of original text and the annotation of teaching materials. After that, it arrive a conclusion by scientific reasoning, identify with reasonable opinions and meaningful discussions of the annotation, and deny inappropriate opinions discussions or discussions .The research is worth in compiling and screening the annotation opinions which different with the annotation in teaching materials, presenting a more integrated version in front of the teaching practitioner and the creator of teaching materials ,and devoting to make the teaching materials taking one step ahead to much more accuracy and complete .The research gets four results: first, investigation many wrong annotations which explain the provenience of original text, then give the right annotation .Second, correct the imprecise and unreasonable annotation .Third, contradict and correct unreasonable annotation opinions. Fourth, systemize the extensional organization of the annotations to make it accordance, so it will be more beneficial for teaching.