| Today, as the popular phenomenon that the Internet is widely used and the scaleof Internet users further growths, The network language is gradually accepted bymore and more people,“nets words text†based on this basis, and it includes networkvulgar and popular style. Thanks to the Micro-blog and other new media’s fastdevelopment, nowadays, with dozens or hundreds of words,“Nets words textâ€, suchas the “roaring body†and the “taobao bodyâ€, continued to be popular on the Internet,and rapidly extended to all the reality areas of life, quietly changing the entire societyincluding literature, forming a spectacular cultural landscape, In the process, therevolutionary force from the language revolution like the vernacular movement to doone hundred years ago. Then, elite intellectuals, such as liang qichao and hu shi, forthe purpose of the enlightenment, used of the language innovation as an opportunity,launch the vernacular movement, finally completed the construction of modernliterature and culture and change people’s ideology, aesthetic ideas. If, say, thevernacular for close to reality and public life, become a modern standard language,so, the “nets words text†as a more popular language, has the ability to become thelanguage of contemporary people specification as the vernacular to do ne hundredyears ago, and the impact on the contemporary literary culture and society of the deepchange? This is what this article discussing.This paper will be divided into three chapters, the first chapter is brieflyintroduces the network language phenomenon and draw the similar vernacularmovement out, and to make clear the comparison research method, list the relevantresearch results, point out the value. The second chapter detailed introduces thebackground, the characteristics and the influence of this two language practice. Thevernacular movement is the occasion for the domestic trouble and foreign invasion,the intellectuals inspired wisdom, to promote the vernacular language for spear,overthrow the literati value position, establish civilian, public value position of theliterary and cultural movement, it has a radical revolutionary tendency, and it is avictory of common people for the purpose of enlightenment. The network language isa variation of the language form, when people get information, communication and entertainment game in the Internet era, its essence is the entertainment and grassrootsparticipation. No matter in the late Qing Dynasty or in The May4th period, thevernacular movement contains a theme of enlightenment, And the Chinese traditionalculture on individual freedom and consciousness of folk depression, emotion andvalue indifference, makes the enlightenment movement development so hard thatfinally failed The third chapter will comparative and analysis these two languagepractice with the theory of “5wâ€, then it is easy to find their common characteristics:folk. Folk value standpoint is both the largest similarities, and also to promote themdevelopment, like the vernacular, the network language come from the folk, and bringwith characteristics of free and defective. So, it’s not necessary to ask for perfection,but should properly guide and standardize it.“Nets words text†is not just" online" language and article, also means a newcultural form In the era of network, this form of culture reflects and refracts thecurrent members of the social values and way of life, and contain rich culturalinformation. This paper compares the “Nets words text†and the vernacular, not meanto predict this emerging cultural phenomenon, and do not want to put it into theso-called folk system or other theoretical framework, but to think about thisphenomenon and the underlying cultural style, and then grasp this phenomenon in thediscussion. If, say, the movement of the vernacular, which contains a enlightenmenttheme one hundred years ago, now the “nets words text†phenomenon shows the civilconsciousness awakening and grassroots effort’s rise, It is the echoes in the networkera from elite one hundred years ago. If the former is that intellectuals as the massstruggle for discourse right in the language tool level efforts, the latter is public toperform such discourse practice now. If the former is a victory of common peopleunder the leadership of the elite, the latter is the carnival of grassroots whichcomposed by masses participate. Of course,“nets words text†is still developing at anastonishing speed, is it has the ability to set off the huge social billows, promoteliterary culture and national progress as the vernacular used to be, It is not the time todraw a conclusion now, however, we have enough reason to looking forward to itbased on the situation of social progress and public participate. |