Administrative Accountability System In Mainland China And Hong Kong Officials Accountability System Comparative Study

With the development of history, the national society is also a progress from the initial primitive society, feudal society, capitalist society to the socialist society, the development of the productive forces to promote the social and political system changes. In the rapid development of productivity, administrative accountability has become a hot topic in the field of social and public management.The administrative accountability system of thought in ancient China, but in disarray after the Opium War, the Qing government’s form of government has been unstable, politically, to attend to the construction and development of political civilization, then, China has experienced up to a period of one hundred years of political turmoil, the government administrative functions of the society is very weak, almost no government social management in the special period, the improvement of social management functions is non-existent. These factors lead to the intellectual development of the administrative accountability system interruption, that the development of China’s administrative accountability later in Western countries. Therefore, in the establishment and improvement of the administrative accountability system, you can learn from the experience of Western countries in this regard, analysis of successes and failures of the Western countries in the process of implementation of the accountability system, in order for our administrative accountability the development of reference. But we need to be clear that the establishment and improvement of any system of any country, and are compatible with their own social and historical background, the reality of different countries in different periods are different, so learn to find suitable for the method of our country.Before the1997handover, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region has been ruled by the British government’s rule lasted for over150years, through the generations, therefore, all aspects of social life in Hong Kong have left traces of the UK, political marks on the more obvious. However, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the accountability system is implemented after the1997handover, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region at that time as a Special Administrative Region under the jurisdiction of the Central People’s Government, the social environment of the accountability system with the Mainland administrative accountability system has some similarities to the environment. Mainland’s administrative accountability and the accountability system will be compared than the relatively more focused accountability system with the West.In this paper, the principal-agent theory, the background of the government theory of the legal system and the new public service accountability system in Hong Kong and the Mainland administrative accountability, and accountability elements and theoretical analysis on the status of the accountability system of Hong Kong and the Mainland administrative accountability, the plight of the administrative accountability system in the Mainland of China and the predicament of existence, the Mainland of China, the administrative accountability system to draw on the feasibility of the accountability system of the Hong Kong SAR On this basis, to improve the recommendations of the administrative accountability system in the Mainland of China.