Difference And Identity: Analyzing The Context And Discourse Of Integrated Risk Governance

From the "entropy" of the natural science to the risk of the social sciences, fromthe "crisis" of the management level to the "emergency" of implementation level, thoseall confirmed that the social risk has changed the basic logic and structure of huma nsociety,which has become a central question of modern society.To carry out theresearch in the field of risk governance, especially Straighten out the logicalrelationship between existing emergency management, crisis management, and riskgovernance,analyzing the scope of academic discourse about risk source, the triggerprocess, the state of emergency (events),is a basic research conforming to the socialdevelopment.Integrated risk governance is a constant interaction process, in which public orprivate organizations and individuals, around the risk source trigger process,state ofemergency (events), support and coordinate mutually. Integrated risk governance is nota complete management system, but it is a collection of many relatively independentmanagement systems; And it is not based on single transaction, but it is around manyissues with strong correlation; It is also not a static management activities but ainteraction process, which contains a variety of management activities. Therefore, theintegration of risk governance is open, complex and non-linear.The basic words in integrated risk governance, means the core concepts ofdiscourse system within the scope of risk governance, which supports the integrationrisk governance, including risk source and risk management, trigger process and crisismanagement, emergency (events), and emergency management. Risk source refers tothe fundamental source of social risk, and it exists in a cycling process from dominantto recessive then to dominant. The Triggers process is the process of risk sourceconverting into a state of emergency. Specific trigger process contains in the interactionrelationship among the natural, goods, capital, technology, system, information, organization, culture, environment and other factors of mutual connection. Thestatement of emergency, refers to the emergencies occurred or is about to happen, whennew risk source can derive. Therefore, we need to admit the discourse differences and atthe same time, we should strengthen the basic identity in academic field, in particular:the social risk is an objective reality, is also a kind of subjective construction; Integratedrisk governance can use inducing or blunting as strategy; To Strengthen the perceptionof integrated risk governance idea, people’s way of thinking and life will be changed.In the cultural context of risk, integration risk governance includes three majorbranches of skeleton,which is risk management, crisis management, and emergencymanagement. From risk management to crisis management,, the new risk sourcederived from the process of crisis management or emergency management will be backto the starting point for risk management,this is a process of move in circles. In thelight of future development, the integration of risk governance is also a subject need tobe improved: the integration risk governance academic platform should be build,professionals should be trained, the public cognition should be fostered, and theintegration of risk governance synergy mechanism should be perfected.