Popper’s "Three Worlds Theory" In The Vision Of Marx’s Philosophy

In Popper’s perspective, the worlds1is physical’s worlds,it is objective, exterior,specifiable and appreciable,and is the world’s basic level. The core of worlds2is brain’scognitive activities, it has the complexity and flexibility features. In front of the1980’s, theworlds3mainly refers to objective knowledge;in1982, in his “Knowledge and the shapingof Reality” speech,some artificial product is treated as a member of the worlds3.Some traditional Marxist often criticized the “three worlds Theory” in "materialist"and"idealistic" framework, with the help of China philosophy、foreign philosophy andMarxist philosophy’s integration, we found that we cannot just defy the worlds3in the visionof old philosophy,for the three worlds theory benefits the people and nature’s metabolismrelationship, knowledge economy and Marx’s philosophy. The worlds1,2,3theory powerfullychallenged the old materialism ontology, it made the former Soviet union’s traditionalmaterialism suffer serious impact. Popper made great difference between worlds2and worlds3, and forced us to reunderstand Marx’s text.As a result,we put forward that the Marxist’sfifth component is sociology. Along with the continuous self revolution of Marx’s text, wefound that Marx’s ontology was not the sort of "material is the unity of world", butpractice-social existence ontology, practice-social production relations ontology andpractice--social structure ontology,and we just made use of the new ontology as the basis totransform the world1,2,3theory.Popper acknowledged the worlds1at any time,however,he put emphasis on naturalexistence, but not human existence, which made he be away from the historical nature. In thepast, Researchers did not care"world" concept,nobody noticed that Popper did’t strictly uesthe "world" concept, as Heidegger pointed out that,the real world phenomenon is omited.Traditional Marxism and Popper’s theory have a big difference from Marx’s "practice-humannature ontology "and "practice-productive relationship of society ontology". Popper tried toget the ontology Crown through shaping of the worlds3, it’s like a brave sailor,who took thewrong ship,and he had to say good bye to people’s world. For Marx,"practice and unity "isthe core of his philosophy, and is also a summary of his practice-social structure ontology.When we pursue what is the worlds3, we have admitted it on ontological level,whichconceals the practice relationship between man and the worlds3, and associated mechanismsbetween herein and being. Therefore, we need to have a new perspective, that is, why theworlds3exists in the world.The converting point is <<on Feuerbach’s outline>>and <<theGerman ideology>>, and the studio is the whole Marx’s philosophy. Since then, the Popper’s"three world" corrupts, while Marx’s practical materialism fight for the throne.