Reason Analysis Of Contribution Difference The Small And Medium Enterprise Among China,America And Japan And Its Enlightenment

With the times developing, the status of small and medium-sized enterprises innational economy is gradually elevating. Every countries’ governments pay theirattentions on the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, and have deeperunderstanding of it. Currently, governments encourage the development of small andmedium-sized enterprises compared with considering it as an important supplement ofnational economy in the past. And creating employed positions is thought as the reasongovernments support small and medium-sized enterprises develop. Now, China is facinga series of issues such as industrial structure upgrading, urbanization speeding up, rurallabor transferring, and the settlement of urban laid-off personnel, Author thinks,developing small and medium-sized enterprises is the most effective way to solve thosereferred issues. Taking advantage of the strengths of small and medium-sizedenterprises is important premise of developing it. The strengths includes low organicstructure, large number of employment, high ability of environment adaption, etc. Thepaper mainly discuss on the contribution small and medium-sized enterprises make onemployment in three countries: China, America and Japan. Through comparison of thethree countries, regular conclusion on small and medium-sized enterprises promotingemployment are derived. Simultaneously, some beneficial experience and enlightenmentcan be provided to the development of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises.The content is: chapter1is exordium,which mainly introduces the studybackground and purpose of paper, related literature review, the study content, method,innovation and shortcoming. Chapter2is theory part, which mainly introduces theregulation of small and medium-sized enterprises’standard, related theory on small andmedium-sized enterprises creating employment and related theory that industrialstructure transition has influenced on creating employment. Chapter3explainsrespectively from three aspects: the situation of macro economy, industrial structuretransition, and industrial distribution features. Under the same measurement index,make a comparison horizontally and vertically of situations that small andmedium-sized enterprises of three countries promote employment. And through theusage of empirical analysis, find out the relation between the number of employment ofsmall and medium enterprises and macro economy development. And in small andmedium-sized enterprises of manufacture industry, its capital and labor’s contributiondegree on output is concluded as well. Through statistical comparison and analysis,reveal and explain the inner relation between small and medium-sized enterprises of three countries and employment and its cause. Chapter4is the political suggestion andenlightenment, through the conclusion on the development of small and medium-sizedenterprises and employment made in former chapter, we can know how to promote theemployment of small and medium-sized enterprises. Meanwhile, some politicalsuggestion is put forward.The conclusion and inspiration obtained from comparison of threecountries’statistics are: The development of small and medium-sized enterprises hasclose relationship with macro environment. The employment elasticities of small andmedium-sized enterprises are all over economic growth elasticities in the threecountries.Now the development of small and medium-sized enterprises belongs tomaleic economic cycle. And for America and Japan, they have the phenomenon ofinverse economic cycle. Therefore, when economy recesses, small and medium-sizedenterprises play an important role in stable employment. The employment of Chinesesmall and medium-sized enterprises consentrate on the second industry, while Americaand Japan’s consentrate on the third industry. The labor flow of Chinese small andmedium-sized enterprises shows saltatory in the process of industrial transition. On thecontrary, the population of employment of mall and medium-sized enterprises inAmerica and Japan is gradually decreasing, that is the industry hollowing in somedegree, There are big difference in three countries’ service industry of small andmedium-sized enterprises including industry distribution and developmentlevel.Manufactural industry of small and medium-sized enterprise between China andJapan are in different level. Now China’s is labor-intensive industry, while Japan’s iscapital and technology intensive industry.A certain of political suggestion and enlightenment are proposed including thatgovernment need to set development direction of small and medium-sized enterprisesand build external environment that is good to the development of small andmedium-sized enterprises. We can use industry support policy and technicalinnovation policy to lead to structure upgrading and adjustment. Government shallguide to develop the industry that possess big employment potential. At the same time,strengthening staff training system of small and medium-sized enterprises and improveits micro employment environment are necessary.