Network Real-name System Research In China

The key point of this paper is the implementation of the network real name, although the network of violence in the network life an endless stream of bad information emerging cybercrime is increasingly serious, the network lack of moral responsibility and many other issues play to reduce or eliminate the role. However, the network real name, there are many implementation difficulties and controversy behind the fierce battle for public power and private rights. Therefore, we must fully consider and learn from the experience of foreign real-name system on the basis of exploring the network real name based on the concept of Internet governance.This article introduce and describe the network real-name system of the concept and characteristics; combing the China’s network real-name system of the policy background and development trajectory, explore the Internet development and network speech spewing the relationship between the basis, the analysis of the government on network real name policy considerations as well as of our network real-name system specific implementation steps; this article stood in a objective point of view to discuss China’s implementation of the plight of the network real name and controversies facing technical problems, such as legislative and enforcement deficiencies, higher policy costs, lack of social support, and reduce the number of users, infringement of citizens’ comments freedom, weakening the right to citizen oversight and participation rights, diverted to the virtual space of the network, reducing network entertainment, and infringement of citizens’privacy; try to reveal the plight of the network real name and controversy behind the logic-public and private power struggles and Citizens want; in research and analysis of the, including South Korea and Europe and the United States national foreign network real-name system experience lessons of the basis of the development prospects of China’s network real-name system of the outlook and recommend changes in government roles and functions, and flexible implementation of the network real name to overcome one size fits all, sound participate in the system and the regulations and policies, to strengthen the protection of citizens’ privacy and citizens’ participation and Internet users exercise self-discipline combining ways to achieve good governance of the Internet in China. The research methods used in this article is mainly literature analysis, comparative analysis and case studies. By the author on the Internet long-term use, attention and research,combined with a wealth of literature,launched a multi-level inquiry on the implementation of the network real name difficulties and controversies, and future trends.Possible innovation in this article is to explore through the controversy behind the private and public power struggle to explore the contradictions and tensions between behind the government "paternalism" management philosophy and civil rights of the individual consciousness, and Internet Governance as the future of the Internet the direction of the development.Finally, stressed that the government change Internet governance is a the network real name reasonable trend. The only reasonable definition of the boundaries of public and private power on the basis of the improvement of the institutional framework, the transformation of their roles and governance flexibility in the use, in order to truly realize the advantages of good governance of the Internet.