| With the acceleration of the urbanization in China, a lot of cultivated land was occupied. However, according to the special contradiction between comparatively limited land and huge population in china, we must retain a sufficient number of arable land to ensure the safety of the food strategy, In this context, as an particularly effective measure, the land consolidation play a crucial role in easing the increasingly tense contradiction between people and land, and increasing the cultivated area. The land consolidation,which is a systematic project involving the interests of all, is usually implemented by the government through the operation of the top-down approach. The farmers are the main beneficiariers, but their voice and suggestions are not valued and accepted during the entire implementation process. Therefore, under this circumstances, the study of the famers willingness to participate the land consolidation, the affect of the land consolidation planning and the implementing benefits after farmers participating, has important theoretical and practical significance.In this thesis, we take two groups of land consolidation project foe an example. One group is under the conditions of the farmers’ participation (abbreviated as group Ⅰ), the other under the conditions of the farmers’ non-oarticipation (abbreviated as group Ⅱ). By using questionnaire survey and mathematical models, at the beginning, we analysis the famers’ cognitive attitude towards the land consolidation and the current situation of the famers’ participation. Next we employ logistic regression model to quantitative analysis the impact factors of famers participating; Then we select the relevant indicators and comparatively analysis the influence of land consolidation planning which is caused by farmers participation; At last, by employing matter-element extension model, we measure the two comprehensive benefits of the land consolidation under the two difference conditions. The main research results are as follows:1. Among all the investigated farmers, about91.07%of the farmers have heard of the land consolidation, mainly by the two approachs:o village cadres and TV; About90.18%are eager for carrying out the land consolidation in their zone; About70.54%have participated in the land consolidation, but in this group, village cadres and villagers’ representatives occupied41.08%. As a results, the grassroots participates less; The participating time-point of the majority farmers focus on the construction phase and lag in the time-point; farmers choose paid-work or make suggestions to avoid risk in the participation; about85.71%of them reflect the problem of the land consolidation directly or indirectly; the analytic result of the logistic regression model shows that farmers’ age, the amount of cultivated land and paddy filed, the agricultural net income, farmers familiarity of the land consolidation, the wish of carrying out the project,have positive influence on farmers’ willingness to participation, while farmers sex, occupation, have negative impact.2. In group Ⅰ, the average proportion of the terracing on slope cropland in construction scale is3.70%, but in group Ⅱ the result is5.86%, which is higher than the former; The terracing earthwork per unit in group Ⅰ is839.97cubic meters, while in the later group, the result is999.6cubic meters. The stonework without concrete per unit in group Ⅰ is257.78cubic meters, while in group Ⅱ the result is291.55cubic meters, the terracing earthwork per unit and the stonework without concrete per unit in group Ⅰ is lower than the later group.3. The maintenance rate of pool in group Ⅰ is significantly higher than it in group Ⅱ;but the average amount of new water reservoir in group Ⅰ is lower than the amount in group Ⅱ; the average growth of the density of irrigation canal in group Ⅰ is204.29%, and the same index in group Ⅱ is66.2%, the average growth of the density of drainage ditches in group I is850.48%, and the same index in group Ⅱ is233.88%, the result shows that the average growth of the density of irrigation canal and drainage ditches in group Ⅰ is higher than the later group; the average growth of the radiation area in dry land in group Ⅰ, on which the irrigation and drainage influence, is187.39%, and the same index in group Ⅱ is151.91%, which shows that there is no significant difference between the two groups; the average growth of the radiation area in paddy filed in group Ⅱ, on which the irrigation and drainage influence, is88.42%, and the same index in group Ⅰ is254.74%, the influence on paddy field in group Ⅰ is significantly better than it in group Ⅱ; From the perspective of the changing of global Moran’Ⅰ index, the irrigation and drainage system show spatial agglomeration state in group I, while it show spatial dispersion state in group Ⅱ.4.The average proportion of concrete field road within the total length in the project in group Ⅰ is69.72%, and the same index in group Ⅱ is66.72%, the data show that the average proportion in group Ⅰ is higher; the average growth of the density of production road in group I is108.49%, while the same index in group Ⅱ is31.26%, which is lower than it in group Ⅰ; the average growth of the density of field road in group Ⅰ is16.85%, and the same index in group Ⅱ is29.66%,which is higher than it in group Ⅰ; form the perspective of changing the road network global Moran’Ⅰ index, the road network in group I shows slightly agglomeration in spatial while it shows significant agglomeration in group Ⅱ; form the perspective of road proximity, the average growth of the network index in group I, which is α, β, λ, is obviously higher than it in group Ⅱ and the optimization of the road network under the farmers participation is obvious; form the change of the influence which the field road impact on the cultivated land and residential areas, the average growth in group I, which the field road impact on the residential areas, is82.9%, the average growth in dry land is105.6%, and the growth in paddy field is128.4%, while the same index in farmer non-participation is31.71%,33.11%,19.68%i ndependently, the data shows that the influence in group I is obvious in the comparison of the farmer non-participation.5. Based on the matter-element extension model, the results show that:the maximum integrated correlation coefficient of the economic benefits in Bishan qitong project is-0.0243, and the evaluation is good; the maximum integrated correlation coefficient of the social benefits is0.0801, and the evaluation of the results as well; the maximum integrated correlation coefficient of the landscape and ecological benefits is0.0217, and the evaluation is general; the maximum integrated correlation coefficient of the comprehensive benefits is0.0297, and the evaluation is good, the maximum integrated correlation coefficient of the economic benefits in Hechuan dashi project is0.0624, and the evaluation is good; the maximum integrated correlation coefficient of the social benefits is0.0120, and the evaluation is general; the maximum integrated correlation coefficient of the landscape and ecological benefits is-0.0058, and the evaluation is general; the maximum integrated correlation coefficient of the comprehensive benefits is0.0109, and the evaluation is good; Compared with the group of the farmers non-participation, the economic benefits in farmers participation is lower while the other two index is higher. What’s more, the comprehensive benefits in farmers participation is higher. |
PDF Full Text Request