| Although the social development model of Israeli Kibbutz exists in capitalistcountries and the social development model of China’s Huaxi exists in socialistcountries, but both of them have strong socialist characteristics and work up to now.They proved the valueã€merits and feasibility of the socialism. This article comparedthe development model of Israeli Kibbutz with the development model of China’sHuaxi village, analysed the similarities and differences of them from political factorã€economic factor and cultural factor three aspects, looking forward to providereference and reference for building a new socialist countryside in China.First of all, this article gave a brief introduction to the two social developmentmodels, and then compared them from political factorã€economic factor and culturalfactor three aspects, only to find the similarities and differences. At last, I summed upthe reference for China’s socialist new rural construction. In political constructionaspect, it mainly refers to strengthen the Party’s leadershipã€perfect the villagersautonomy system and perfect the democracy at the grassroots level construction. Inaspect of promoting economy, it mainly refers to accelerate the development ofmodern agriculture, develop the second and the third industry to broaden the channelsof increasing farmers’ income; In terms of cultural construction, it mainly refers todevelop the advanced culture, change what is backward and promote the legalizationã€standardization and institutionalization of the rural cultural construction... |