| In this Chongqing Normal University undergraduate class of2010undergraduatefootball selective course in a random sample of two class (80people) as the researchobject, one as the experimental class (40people), the other one was control group (40people), one semester of a total of36hours of teaching experimental research, in whichthe experimental group using the cooperative learning method in teaching, the controlgroup used the traditional teaching method teaching. Of all the subjects in theexperiment were carried out before and after the experiment of body shape, physicalfitness, soccer skill, cooperation consciousness, competition consciousness and groupcohesiveness tests, test index showed no significant difference, suitable for teachingexperiment; in is to provide to the student self evaluation of teaching effect of studentson the questionnaire, in order to ensure questionnaire validity, questionnaires beforeplease experts on this study was to conduct a comprehensive audit assessmentquestionnaire, and a questionnaire to make a" very effective"," effective"," general " and" less effective,"" invalid" level five degree of qualitative evaluation. The resultsshowed, content validity, suitable for the analysis of the questionnaires, thequestionnaire to recover books for the reliability analysis, questionnaire, the clone ofBach a coefficient is0.712, split-half reliability was0.734, illustrate the questionnairedata can reflect the real student evaluation of teaching effect.The use of SPSS and EXCEL on experimental and questionnaire and the testresults are analyzed. Results display:1, the former students each index showed no significant difference. From our testbody shape index, physical quality, soccer skill, cooperation consciousness, competitionconsciousness, group cohesion, two group member’s basic situation is basic and same.Two group members in various indicators of no significant difference, suitable forteaching experiment.2, after the experiment student’s body shape index difference. Cooperativelearning method in the experimental group weight, bust, waist, thigh circumference,vital capacity of5indicators are significantly higher than those in control group; beforeand after the experiment, the experimental group ’s own change, the experimental groupweight, bust, waist, thigh circumference, vital capacity of5indicators are significantlyhigher than that before; the control group was higher than that of the experiment of weight and chest circumference former; cooperative learning and traditional learningmethod for the students’ height had no effect; compared with the cooperative learningand traditional teaching method in terms of weight were significantly influence onstudents. Description of cooperative learning approach in promoting college student’sbust, waist, thigh circumference, vital capacity4index effect.3, after the experiment of students’ physical quality index difference. Cooperativelearning method in the experimental group50meters run, standing long jump,1000meters, the seat body flexion on4index were significantly higher than that of thetraditional teaching method in the control group before and after the experiment, theexperimental group; the change of view, after the test runs50meters, standing longjump,1000meters,25meters, the seat body ante flexion reentry run the5indicators areincreased, and before the experiment showed significant changes before and after theexperiment, the control group; the change of view, standing long jump and the25metershuttle run score showed significant changes; cooperative learning and traditionalteaching method on students standing long jump and the25metre shuttle runperformance enhancement effect are showed change.4, after the experiment students football skills component index difference.Cooperative learning method in the experimental group, the medial side of the foot ballshoot three sentinel, dribbling around the head shot, shot the4indicators weresignificantly higher than that of the traditional teaching method in the control groupbefore and after the experiment, the experimental group; the change of view, Kitty, themedial side of the foot point shooting, dribbling kicking around the shot it with3indicators before the experiment showed significant changes before and after theexperiment, the control group; the change of view, three index showed significantchange; cooperative learning and traditional teaching method on three skill effects wereaffected significantly; cooperative learning and traditional teaching method on arcadeshoot skill effects are not significant.5, after the experiment of students’ cooperative consciousness difference index.Cooperative learning method in the experimental group inclusive, mutual dimension,gregarious desire dimensions3dimension scores above were significantly higher thanthat of the traditional teaching method in the control group scored, description ofcooperative learning on students’ cooperative consciousness raising significant role;before and after the experiment, the experimental group ’s change of view, after the testof inclusive dimension, reciprocity dimension group, will3dimension scores were improved, and before the experiment showed significant changes before and after theexperiment, the control group; the change of view, cooperation consciousness3dimension indexes are improved, gregarious intention dimensions showed significantchanges; gregarious intention scores in a cooperative learning and traditional teachingmethods have significant improvement.6, after the experiment students’ competitive consciousness index difference.Cooperative learning method in the experiment group, excessive competition,self-development dimension scores above2were significantly higher than that of thetraditional teaching method in the control group scored, description of cooperativelearning on students competitive consciousness rise obviously; before and after theexperiment, the experimental group ’s change of view, after the test of excessivecompetition, self growth dimensions dimensions2dimension scores were improved, andbefore the experiment showed significant changes before and after the experiment, thecontrol group; the change of view, competition consciousness3dimension indexes areimproved, self growth dimensions showed significant changes; self growth dimensionscores of cooperative learning and traditional teaching method can be improved.7, after the experiment students group cohesion index difference. Cooperativelearning method in the experimental group cohesion scores improved significantly,from the scores before and after the experiment, cooperative learning students scorehigher than traditional teaching students, illustrate the cooperative learning method ongroup cohesion has significant effect to improve. The traditional teaching method onstudents’ group cohesion scores improved, but had no significant difference, show thatthe traditional teaching method on students’ group cohesion rises somewhat, but theeffect is not obvious.8, after the experiment results there was no significant difference between thestudents football theory. After the test students football theory achievement, students inthe experimental group theory average scores higher than that in the control group, butshowed no significant difference, show that cooperative learning teaching methodcompared with traditional teaching method, on the very high student academicperformance effect.9, after the experiment students’ football teaching effect evaluation of differences.The experimental group students for the football specialized course attitude is morepositive than the control class; students of the experimental class of teaching method ismore interesting, students in the experimental group than in the control group students for teaching method effect is more satisfied.Based on the above conclusions are proposed:1, proposed in the teaching ofuniversity physical education courses to promote cooperation learning;2, suggestionsfor improving the comprehensive quality of PE teachers adapt to the cooperativeteaching method;3, proposed to increase the girls for cooperative teaching methodexperimental study. |
PDF Full Text Request